Laserfiche WebLink
F:t?Or-1 AGE NC _209 956 0700 <br /> P. 6 <br /> 04 April 1997 <br /> AGE-NC-95-0112 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> • Approximately 1,463 gallons of gasoline was estimated to be in soil prior to remediation; <br /> 240 gallons of gasoline remain after remediation. This represents a reduction of 83.6%of <br /> hydrocarbons at the site. <br /> • Benzene has not been detected in soil samples collected at the site since remediation began. <br /> Toluene was detected in only two of 30 samples collected since remediation began. <br /> Ethylbenzene and xylenes were detected in two of eleven samples analyzed from the <br /> February 1997 soil sampling event. Therefore, the lighter-range, and more ha7ardou5 <br /> hydrocarbons have been remediated at the site. <br /> • Geophysical analyses indicate a dense soil of low porosity beneath the site. Although <br /> permeability calculations could not be made,these site conditions are generally associated <br /> with soil of lower permeability. The potential for future migration of contamimmts is <br /> therefore lowered. <br /> 4.2. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon data obtained during the February 1997 and previous sampling events, AGE has the <br /> following recommendations: <br /> • Computer modeling should be performed to determine the potential for contaminants <br /> remaining in soil to impact ground water. <br /> • No additional vapor extraction should be performed at this time_ <br /> • if the PHS-EHD requires additional vapor extraction, a blower/carbon canister extraction <br /> system should be used. <br /> • rPH-g and BTE&X were not detected in ground water samples collected during the January <br /> 1997 monitoring event. The next monitoring event should be scheduled for April 1997 to <br /> Qonfinm successful remediation of ground water at the site. <br /> 5.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities. The findings were based mainly <br /> upon analytical results provided by an independent laboratory.Evaluation of the geologic conditions <br /> at the site has been made from a limited number of available data points (i.e. soil borings), and <br /> subsurface conditions may vary through time and with distance from these data points. No other <br /> warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional recommendations contained in this <br /> report. <br />