Laserfiche WebLink
5 August 1992 <br /> (GeoAudit CV 30-34E3-1.47) <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> i1 <br /> MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING <br />� Two additional monitoring wells were installed on 22 and 23 June <br /> x 1992 (Figure 2) . MW-4 was installed approximately 50 feet northeast <br /> of MW-1. MW-5 was installed immediately adjacent to MW-2 . <br /> I <br /> The borings were advanced to a h using a truck <br />;. mounted 8-inch hollow-stem auger rig. The "r -2 drill rig and <br /> two man crew were supplied by West Hazmat Drilling Corporation. <br /> t Discrete soil samples were collected ahead of the drill bit using <br /> a split-tube sampler loaded with three pre-cleaned 2. 5 by 6 inch <br /> brass tubes. The samples were obtained at five foot intervals. To <br /> avoid cross contamination, the sampling equipment was washed in a <br /> tri-sodium phosphate (TSP) solution and rinsed twice with water <br /> prior to each sampling run. <br /> For each sample, both ends of the lead tube were covered with <br /> aluminum sheets, capped and sealed with tape. The samples were <br /> stored on ice pending transmission to a state certified laboratory <br /> N - (Alpha Analytical Laboratories in Ukiah) . Selected samples were <br /> analyzed for TPH as gasoline, BTE&X and total lead. <br /> Soil from the second brass tube was extruued and screened for the <br /> presence of organic vapors using a photo-ionization detector (PID: <br /> Thermo Environmental 580A, 10. 0 eV, calibrated to isobutylene) . The <br /> ;. soil was then describers in accordance with the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System (see Boring Logs) . <br /> The borings were completed as groundwater monitoring wells by the <br /> installation of 0. 020 screen PVC liner. MW-4 was screened from 49 <br /> to 74 feet. Bentonite pellets were used from 47 to 49 feet and the <br />' well was backfilled to the surface with Portland Cement. MW-5 was <br /> m screened from 50 to 75 feet. Bentonite pellets were used from 48 to <br /> 50 feet and the well was backfilled to the surface with Portland <br /> I, Cement. <br /> All five on-site wells were surveyed on 30 June 1992 and water <br /> levels were measured. Water samples were collected from the new <br /> wells (MW-4 and MW-5) , but neither MW-1 nor MW-3 could be sampled <br /> due to low water levels (although the depth to water could be <br /> measured in MW-1) . A PVC bailer. as used to surge and purge the <br />. —+i.., ...... ..trt✓a..xJ3LibM14Gi� ! .y�uP�yciv�^aa W& Wuni Wele et:A1uVCl1 Liulu eaQh <br /> well prior to sample collection. Water temperature, pH and <br /> conductivity were measured at one gallon intervals using a Hydac <br /> water analyzer (Table 3) . The purged water was stored in a 55- <br /> gallon drum on site. <br /> Awl . <br />