My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0080810 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EDNA
>
1660
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0080810 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2019 4:52:28 PM
Creation date
11/6/2019 4:48:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0080810
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
1660
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
EDNA
STREET_TYPE
CT
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
25530003
ENTERED_DATE
6/25/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
1660 W EDNA CT
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussion of Nitrate Loading Results <br /> Total Nitrate Impact <br /> Based on the method and assumptions described, the result of the nitrate loading <br /> estimate indicates that the existing and proposed development on the Site may cause a <br /> buildup of nitrates in the aquifer above 10 mg/L-N. <br /> There are three mitigating factors that should be considered, however, when evaluating <br /> whether or not this Site is likely to impact ground water with nitrate.. <br /> • The Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is a conservative method for <br /> determining potential impacts, and actual nitrate loading experienced on the Site <br /> over time may be less than predicted. The requirement by San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department that the calculation use rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration data to determine ground-water recharge is particularly <br /> conservative, as it does not include consideration of regional recharge from <br /> irrigation water or surface water sources. <br /> • Based on the clay soil type present on the Site, it is likely that adsorption of <br /> nitrate ions to clay will occur as percolating effluent travels downward through the <br /> vadose zone. The soil factors discussed in the Hantzsche and Finnemore paper <br /> may not reflect the true nitrate reduction experienced as the effluent travels down <br /> through the vadose zone. <br /> • According to the San Joaquin County map reviewed, several wells in the area <br /> have been tested for nitrate; none are exhibiting nitrate levels above 10 mg/L-N. <br /> Nitrate was detected in the on-site domestic well at a concentration of 6.2 mg/L- <br /> N. The test results may indicate that residential development in the area has not <br /> adversely impacted water quality. <br /> Based on the factors discussed above, it is likely that the actual nitrate impact to the <br /> ground water will be less than predicted. Nevertheless, it is anticipated that the San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health Department may require nitrate mitigation for the <br /> new septic system. <br /> LOGE 1925 Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.