FIELD DOCUMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

California VSgional Water Quality Contiel Boardgo Central Valley Region Karl E.Longley,ScD,P.E.,Chair Linda S.Adams Arnold Secretary for Sacramento Main Office Schwarzenegger SecretEnviroryfor 11020 Sun Center Drive#200,Rancho Cordova,California 95670-6114 Governor Protection Phone(916)464-3291 •FAX(916)464-4645 http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley iD�CE�IYE[D Ul December 19, 2007 DEC 2 1 2007 ENVIRONMENT HEALTH Mr. Philip Goalwin PERMIT/SERVICES E2C Remediation 5300 Woodmere Drive, Suite 105 Bakersfield, CA 93313 REVIEW OF DRAFT FACT SHEET AND DRAFT FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN, FORMER BUSY BEE CLEANERS, 40 NORTH MAIN STREET, LODI, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Staff of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (Regional Water Board) has reviewed the Draft Remedial Action Plan Fact Sheet and the Draft Final Remedial Action Plan (RAP) for the Former Busy Bee Cleaners (the Site), 40 North Main Street. Lodi, San Joaquin County. The documents are dated November 6, 2007, and were received by the Regional Water Board on December 7, 2007. Your environmental consulting firm, E2C Remediation, Inc., of Bakersfield prepared the documents on behalf of the representatives of the Busy Bee Site. Draft RAP Fact Sheet. On October 15, 2007 the Regional Water Board prepared and submitted comments on the Draft RAP Fact Sheet. Our comments on the Draft RAP Fact sheet have been adequately addressed. Staff concurs with Draft RAP Fact Sheet as submitted, and we recommend you finalize the document for distribution. As stated in our October 15, 2007 letter, the Regional Water Board concurs with the preferred manner for distributing the Final Fact Sheet, which is hand delivery to surrounding businesses and residences within a two-block radius of the Site. In addition, we recommend that selected mailing be conducted to the City of Lodi, Department of Public Works, and other identified interested parties. Draft Final RAP. On October 15, 2007 the Regional Water Board prepared and submitted comments on the Draft RAP. Our comments on the Draft RAP have been adequately addressed. However, staff recommends that one issue be clarified for the final RAP concerning the list of the Key Monitoring Wells as described on page 15 of the Pay for Performance (PFP) Contract. The list specified nine wells to be used for the baseline monitoring and future evaluation of remedial performance. There is confusion in the list as it was stated in the PFP Contract. Following is a table that differentiates between the wells listed in the original PFP Contract, our recommendations to clarify the list of Key Wells to be defined by the RAP (highlighted in bold), California Environmental Protection Agency Ca Rec},cled Paper