My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
40
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518875
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2019 4:04:13 PM
Creation date
11/12/2019 3:19:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518875
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014182
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER BUSY BEE CLEANERS
STREET_NUMBER
40
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
40 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Joseph Salazar, Jr <br /> Former Busy Bee Cleaners - 3 - August 20, 2003 <br /> RI/FS Work Plan <br /> 3. A Public Participation Plan (PPP) was not included in our copy of the Work Plan. Busy Bee <br /> should conduct community interviews to identify public concerns and then prepare a separate <br /> PPP that identifies the key public participation activities to be performed. The PPP should <br /> conform to 40 CFR Subpart E and DTSC guidance, available on the DTSC website. <br /> 4. Busy Bee needs to develop a sampling and analysis plan(SAP) for the proposed field activities. <br /> The SAP generally has two parts; 1) a Field Sampling Plan(FSP) and 2) a Quality Assurance <br /> Project Plan (QAPP). Additional information regarding the contents of those plans is provided in <br /> 40 CFR 300.430(b)(8) and available US EPA guidance documents. <br /> 5. More detailed information needs to be presented regarding the proposed remedial alternatives <br /> pilot tests. Generally, a separate work plan for each pilot test is preferred. The work plans <br /> should include a rationale for conducting the pilot study, details regarding the <br /> protocols/procedures to be implemented, and an explanation as to how the data will be used. <br /> Each pilot study should include the SAP elements (see comment#4, above) and an HSP (see <br /> comment#1, above). <br /> 6. Generally, an RI/FS work plan should initiate the identification of State requirements and, as <br /> appropriate, other criteria, advisories, or guidance to-be-considered that are to be complied with <br /> during the investigation and clean-up phases of the project. Attached are lists of RWQCB <br /> requirements for both soil and groundwater cleanups. <br /> Because the amount of additional information requested is significant, we request that Busy Bee provide <br /> a revised-draft version of the document for further review and comment. <br /> If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 255-3412, or by email at <br /> austind@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov. <br /> DUNCAN AUSTIN, P.E. <br /> Water Resources Control Engineer <br /> cc: Mr. Mike Vivas,DTSC, Sacramento <br /> Harlin Knoll, San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Stockton <br /> Fran Forkas, City of Lodi, Lodi <br /> Phillip Goalwin, E2C Remediation, Bakersfield <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.