My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOLLY
>
3900
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544990
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2019 1:56:13 PM
Creation date
11/15/2019 1:47:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0544990
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006902
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY WASTEWATER TX PLNT
STREET_NUMBER
3900
STREET_NAME
HOLLY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3900 HOLLY DR
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TPHD, with one relatively elevated level of 33,000 micrograms per liter(ug/1) TPHD in B-2 in a <br /> downgradient location. BTEX, MTBE and related oxygenates were not revealed in any <br /> groundwater sample. <br /> Wright drilled and sampled five (5) additional borings (B-5, B-6, B-7, B-8 and B-9) in October <br /> 2008. Soil and groundwater samples were collected and analyzed only for TPHD since previous <br /> analysis had shown that gasoline and related fuel compounds had not been detected. TPHD <br /> dissolved concentrations were relatively low in groundwater. Boring B-6 drilled adjacent to <br /> Boring B-2 showed only 170 Ug/1 (compared to 33,000 Ug/1 at B-2 in 2003) a significant <br /> decrease. The laboratory reported that the TPHD was higher boiling than typical diesel fuel. In <br /> our opinion a large contaminant problem is not indicated from this data, and only a small <br /> dissolved residual and possi y r e H,L�: ume is present. <br /> On the basis of a data review d dis ss s wi staff, EHD requested that one (1)groundwater <br /> monitoring well be installed near Wright boring B-5. This new well is used in conjunction <br /> nearby existing WWTP groundwater monitoring wells MWHP-5, MWHP-6, MWHP-7 and <br /> MW HP-8 installed by CH2M Hill for groundwater direction plots (see Figures 1 and 2). It is <br /> our understanding from a limited review of the existing CH2M Hill wells that they are screened <br /> in the same aquifer strata as that investigated in the area of the proposed new monitoring well by <br /> Wright in 2003 and 2008. The new well was designated "MWWES-1" to avoid confusion <br /> between this monitoring well and the existing CH2M Hill monitoring wells. <br /> The CH2M Hill wells (MWHP-5, MWHP-6, MWHP-7 and MWHP-8) are used for water level <br /> measurements only. These measurement data are used to plot groundwater flow contours <br /> together with well MWWES-1. The new well was sampled for both water level measurement <br /> and chemical analysis program discussed below. The existing CH2M Hill wells are not sampled <br /> for groundwater quality for this Wright groundwater monitoring program. <br /> 2.0 Monitoring Well Water Level Measurements and Sampling <br /> The contract sampler developed the well MWWES-I on September 9, 2009. The monitoring <br /> well was first purged using calculated well volumes based upon the depth to water in each casing <br /> prior to sampling. Depth to groundwater measurements were made to the nearest one-one <br /> hundredth of one foot, and also checked for the presence of separate phase product. As each <br /> purge volume is removed, measurements of pH, electrical conductivity, turbidity, and <br /> temperature will be taken until these parameters stabilize over two measurements, which are <br /> interpreted to indicate aquifer water entering the casing. The well was allowed to stabilize to <br /> about 80% of its initial water level before sampling. <br /> The groundwater sample was carefully collected with a clean disposable PVC bailer and poured <br /> with minimum cavitation and minimum headspace into the appropriate laboratory prepared <br /> containers. The water sample was labeled, logged onto a chain-of-custody form, and placed in a <br /> chilled ice chest on crushed ice for transport to the laboratory. Upon completion of monitoring <br /> water level measurements and/or well sampling, each well was closed and locked. Well purge <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.