My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0539293
>
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2019 3:00:05 PM
Creation date
11/20/2019 2:56:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0539293
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0022465
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY MOTORS
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
800 E MAIN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PREFERRED METHOD <br /> It is our understanding that San Joaquin County will review this evaluation and issue a`, <br /> comment letter on the chosen remedial method,and that the next step will.be to prepare a <br /> more detailed work plan to install the wells'and test the method. <br /> Upgradient Environmental Consultants'believes that groundwater-extraction is preferable <br /> to in-well air stripping on most counts,especially if significant cleanup is achieved within <br /> the first year.Like most consultants,we are familiar with this method and can respond , <br /> quickly to any difficulties that may arise,adjust or modify the system,change out any <br /> pumps or other parts that may require repair,and otherwise operate and maintain the- <br /> system as often as needed. The air stripping method would require contacting the vendor <br /> in Kansas and+would likely require bringing iri a specialist from their company to service <br /> -or repair the equipment. This would likely result'in longer delays in operationand higher <br /> costs,and would not provide as timely and convenient service to Valley Motors.The <br /> number of moving parts is greater for.the stripping method,creating the potential for <br /> more things to go wrong. Hence, from an ease of operation and reliability standpoint,we <br /> favor groundwater extraction. <br /> The most significant drawback with groundwater extraction is the,cost of water disposal, <br /> but if the pre-disposal treatment is successful it may be possible to reduce the frequency . <br /> of sampling after the system begins to demonstrate success,and also obtain a reduced- <br /> disposal rate from the City of Stockton. If so,c6sts could be less than anticipated. <br /> Furthermore,the disposal cost is tied to zthe volume of discharged water,and this volume <br /> cannot be reliably estimated before conducting a pumping test.Thus,the volume and <br /> disposal rate could be higher or lower than that shown in Table 2,depending on how fast <br /> the wells can actually be pumped. It is easier to adjust the pumping rate than it is in the <br /> in-well air stripping method,'which is another advantage of groundwater extraction. <br /> 1 _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.