My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0539293
>
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2019 3:00:05 PM
Creation date
11/20/2019 2:56:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0539293
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0022465
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY MOTORS
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
800 E MAIN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 1. COMPARISON OF IN-WELL AIR STRIPPING (ART) AND PUMP AND TREAT <br /> SYSTEM INSTALLATION <br /> Remedial wells Two new 6"wells for both methods, but P&T can also use existing 2"wells--advantage P&T <br /> Subsurface plumbing P&T--connection to sanitary sewer&additional PVC pipe needed to connect 2"wells--advantage ART <br /> Subcontractor/vendor Needed for ART installation &maintenance--advantage P&T <br /> service expenses <br /> Regulatory permits Air Quality permit required for ART, water disposal permit for P&T--possibly slight cost advantage for ART <br /> Overall installation costs, Advantage P&T f <br /> including other equipment <br /> SYSTEM TESTING <br /> Pilot tests Needed to size vapor destruction unit and blower and vapor concentrations for ART <br /> Pump test needed to determine optimum pumping rate and hydrocarbon concentrations to be treated--possibly advantage <br /> P&T, depending on duration of in-well stripping test <br /> SYSTEM OPERATION <br /> Equipment costs Pump&compressor rental or replacement equal for both methods--no advantage <br /> If destruction by carbon used for both methods, more frequent replacement of carbon vessels for P&T--advantage ART <br /> If vapor destruction by oxidizer used for ART, rental cost likely to exceed cost of carbon vessels for P&T--advantage P&T <br /> Utility costs Electrical costs higher for ART due to power requirements, blower, &possibly oxidizer for destruction--advantage P&T <br /> Monitoring&sampling ART--monthly monitoring of vapor concentrations/destruction efficiency, vacuum, dissolved OZ,carbon vessels <br /> P&T--weekly sampling of effluent stream, pump operation--advantage ART <br /> Laboratory costs ART--quarterly vapor samples <br /> P&T--weekly water samples--advantage ART <br /> Disposal costs None for ART; minimum $750/month for P&T, but could be higher depending on pumping rate--advantage ART <br /> Well sampling& monitoring Quarterly for both methods--no advantage <br /> Data analysis& reporting Analysis time greater for ART due to inclusion of vapor data--advantage P&T <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.