Laserfiche WebLink
r Mike Mc Nulty <br /> Page 2 <br /> The information obtained through the construction of additional <br /> soil borings, along with the groundwater monitoring data, will be <br /> presented in the final remediation plan (FRP) . The FRP will <br /> characterize the site, provide a scaled map illustrating the <br /> excavation relative to the existing monitoring wells, and make <br /> recommendations for addressing the residual contaminants <br /> remaining. <br /> During the January meeting, several options for addressing the <br /> residual contaminants were discussed: <br /> 1. source removal II° <br /> 2 . in-situ soil venting <br /> 3 . risk assessment for leaving in place and no treatment <br /> or monitoring <br /> 4 . continued groundwater monitoring only; no treatment <br /> I� <br /> The FRP should adequately discuss at least three of the above <br /> items and conclude, from factual evidence', the. appropriate <br /> remedial action. <br /> � E <br /> Should you disagree with our summary of the January 23 , 1992 <br /> meeting, or have any questions concerning., thzs letter, please <br /> contact Mary Meays, RENS, of my staff at (209j 468-0337 . <br /> Jogi Khanna, M.D. , M.P.H. I <br /> Health Officer <br /> I <br /> durie A. Cotullar REHSr g g Program Manager � <br /> nvironmental Health Division <br /> LAC/MM: lb <br /> C. RWQCB - Elizabeth Thayer <br /> C. WHF Environmental Consultants - Steve Furnas <br /> F � g <br /> I� l <br /> i <br />