Laserfiche WebLink
Interim Remediation Plan and Second Quarter 2001 Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Moore Petroleum Bulk Plant,5491 F Street,Banta,California <br /> Page 4 <br /> PUMPING TEST RESULTS <br /> Preliminary Assessment <br /> As previously mentioned, during the Workplan preparation phase of the IRP,Apex <br /> recommended installing three groundwater recovery wells to effectively draw down the aquifer <br /> and control the potential offsite migration of petroleum constituents dissolved in groundwater. <br /> Groundwater flow in the shallow aquifer is from the southwest to the northeast as shown on the <br /> groundwater contour map presented as Figure 3. The recovery wells were positioned to provide <br /> a means of intercepting groundwater down gradient of the UST excavations and upgradient of the <br /> domestic well located at 5451 F Street. Apex anticipated that the former tank basin area would <br /> have to be significantly dewatered before any changes in groundwater elevations will be <br /> observed in wells MW-3, MW-9, and MW-12 located outside the former tank basin area(Figure <br /> 2). This is due to the relatively low hydraulic conductivity of the native soil at the site (0.0026 <br /> ft/min) as determined by Delta in their report entitled Preliminary Hydrogeologic Assessment <br /> Report dated September 8, `1989.� <br /> As previously mentioned, 8443 only wanted one recovery well installed for the pumping test <br /> and depending on the results, more recovery wells could be installed. Apex installed one <br /> groundwater recovery well RW-2 at the site for the purpose of conducting the pilot pumping test. <br /> Dewatering the entire former tank basin area was not necessary for the purposes of this pumping <br /> test. It was Apex's opinion that a pumping test using a rate of 10-gallons per minute (gpm) will <br /> produce sufficient draw down in the former excavation and provide sufficient hydrogeologic data <br /> to assess the possible effectiveness of groundwater extraction as a remedial alternative for the <br /> site. Based on 48-hours of pumping time,the test would produce approximately 28,800 gallons <br /> of water that would require proper disposal. <br /> Field Activities <br /> On March 26, 2001, Apex personnel lowered a one horsepower submersible pump into the <br /> recovery well RW-2 and installed pressure transducers in monitoring locations MW-3, MW-8, <br /> MW-9, and MW-12. The pretest was initiated to establish an appropriate flow rate. The <br /> pumping was initiated at 10-gpm and groundwater levels monitored at location RW-2 determined <br /> that this rate was too fast. The pump was turned off,the water table was allowed to recover and <br /> the pump was turned on again at 4-gpm, which was also determined to be too fast. The pump <br /> was turned off, the water table was allowed to recover and the pump was turned on again at 2- <br /> gpm, which was determined to be the appropriate flow rate for well RW-2. The pump was <br /> turned off and the groundwater levels were allowed to fully recover 18 hours. <br />