Laserfiche WebLink
Fiddle & Isola, P.C. <br /> A Professional Corporation <br /> Quail Lakes Executive Office Park Telephone: (209) 952-6262 <br /> 2291 W. March Lane, Suite 100D Facsimile: (209) 952-9891 <br /> Stockton, California 95207 10 E-Mail: RiddleIsola@Earthlink.net <br /> March 24, 1997 <br /> Ms. Margaret Lagorio, RENS <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor <br /> P.O. Box 388 <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Mr. Michael Infurna, REHS <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor <br /> P.O. Box 388 <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Re: Michael Souza Property (APN: 238-080-01) Lammers and Byron <br /> Road Tracy, California: Further Regulatory Action <br /> Dear Ms. Lagorio and Mr. Infurna: <br /> This office represents Michael Souza, the owner of the above referenced property located in <br /> Tracy, California (hereinafter "Property"). On March 19, 1997, this office attempted to <br /> schedule a meeting with Mr. Infurna to discuss your agency's position as to any further <br /> regulatory action believed by your agency to be necessary at the Property. Mr. Infurna, <br /> however, refused such a meeting, suggesting that he is too busy to serve the county as he has <br /> been employed to do. As a result of Mr. Infurna's refusal, and the absence of environmental <br /> contamination at the Property, this demand for no further regulatory action follows. <br /> In December, 1994, Mr. Souza voluntarily undertook a subsurface investigation of the <br /> Property to determine the environmental impact, if any, to the Property resulting from <br /> releases of hazardous waste from the nearby Chevron pipeline. Mr. Souza's voluntary <br /> investigation included sampling soils and groundwater from three monitoring wells. The wells <br /> were sampled two additional times, for a total of three groundwater sampling episodes. Except <br /> for the detection of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons during the first sampling episode, all <br /> subsequent sampling episodes have shown all analytes to be below detection limits (See, <br /> February 3, 1995 Mill Creek Report enclosed herewith). <br />