Laserfiche WebLink
Ron Rowe <br /> Registered Environmental Specialist <br /> February 2, 2000 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Finally, the Prior Owners' efforts to assist Del Monte in implementing a remedial approach <br /> (which is both cost effective and which achieves the County's goal of fully characterizing the <br /> Property) have been thwarted. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" are true copies of the <br /> correspondence between counsel for Del Monte and the Prior Owners in which the Prior Owners <br /> note their fundamental inability to effectively and meaningfully participate with Del Monte due <br /> to Del Monte's approach in responding to remedial directives from the County. Parmaceast does <br /> not own the Property and has no authority to enter onto the Property and independently do any of <br /> the work directed by the County. Thus, the inability to influence Del Monte to adopt a pragmatic <br /> approach to remediation has left the Prior Owners without any effective means or responding to <br /> the problems at the Property. j <br /> In light of the lack of credible evidence that Parmaceast was the owner and/or operator of the fi <br /> underground storage tanks immediately before the termination of their use, the new evidence <br /> regarding the level of oxygenates found in the groundwater and the quandary in which <br /> Parmaceast finds itself in not having an opportunity to fulfill the County's directives, Parmaceast <br /> respectfully requests that the County remove Parmaceast as a responsible party for remediation <br /> of the Property. <br /> The following discussion reviews the appropriate standard for naming a responsible party, the <br /> new evidence calling into question Parmaceast's responsible party status and evidence presented <br /> to the County prior to its naming Parmaceast as a responsible party. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Discussion <br /> 1. Legal Standard For Naming Responsible Parties <br /> There are three primary sources that provide guidance on naming responsible parties. The first is <br /> the underground storage tank regulations6; the second is Resolution 92-497, and the third is a <br /> 6 The underground storage tank regulations define responsible party as one or more of the { <br /> following: <br /> (1) Any person who owns or operates an underground storage tank used for the <br /> storage of any hazardous substance; (2) in the case of any underground storage <br /> tank no longer in use, any person who owned or operated the underground storage <br /> tank immediately before the discontinuance of its use; (3) any owner of Property <br /> where the unauthorized release of a hazardous substance from an underground <br /> storage tank has occurred; and (4) any person who had or has control over an <br /> underground storage tank at the time of or following an unauthorized release of a <br /> hazardous substance. <br /> pp <br /> - 761778.3 <br />