Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> from the well water prior to purging should be equal to or higher than the D.O./Eh of the <br /> formation groundwater. Increase in the D.O. and Eh as a result of purging is an <br /> indication of artificial aeration of the water. <br /> Section 3. <br /> Considerations for Very Low Permeability Settings <br /> Monitoring wells screened across very low permeability materials (silts, clays, etc.) <br /> typically purge dry then are allowed to recharge prior to sampling. However, recharge <br /> into a dewatered well results in increased exposure of the water entering the well to the <br /> air present at the water table interface and in the well,potentially altering the groundwater <br /> geochemistry. To attempt to minimize these effects, the pump intake should be placed 2- <br /> 3 feet below the water level and operated at as low a rate as is achievable, ideally equal to <br /> the recovery rate. In this manner, water drawn into the pump would be primarily from <br /> the formation and sand pack pore spaces. Close monitoring of the indicator parameter <br /> measurements is necessary since stabilization should occur prior to one borehole volume. <br /> In some cases, a well may recharge so slowly that it may be impractical or even <br /> impossible to collect a groundwater sample that is truly representative of formation <br /> groundwater with respect to key geochemical parameters. If there is a need to collect <br /> samples/measurements for intrinsic bioremediation parameters in such cases, slowly <br /> purge the well dry and collect the groundwater samples as soon as the necessary volume <br /> has recharged into the well. As previously described in Section 2.6, the D.O. and Eh <br /> should be measured prior to, during, and after purging. An increase in D.O. or Eh is an <br /> indication of artificial aeration of the water, and results should be qualified accordingly. <br /> References <br /> United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. RCRA Ground-Water <br /> Monitoring: Draft Technical Guidance. EPA1530-R-93-001. <br /> Kearl, P.M., et. al. 1994. Field Comparison of Micropurging vs. Traditional Ground <br /> Water Sampling. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation. Fall, 1994 pp. 183-190. <br /> Barcelona, M.J., et. al. 1994. Reproducible Well-Purging Procedures and VOC <br /> Stabilization Criteria for Ground-Water Sampling. Ground Water. Vol 32, No. 1. pp. 12- <br /> 22. <br /> Walton.-Day, K., et. al. 1990. Field Methods for Measurement of Ground Water Redox <br /> Chemical Parameters. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation. Fall, 1990,pp. 81-89. <br /> r <br /> sF010030987.17OC D-5 <br />