SU0002788 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

v 2 not certain we can survive. Businesses like ours generate substantial tax revenue to federal, state and local agencies. Requiring a masonry wall serves no purpose at all other than an expense to us and is a hardship. The site IS large enough to accomodate our rental trucks and we so indicated on the drawing submitted. This is a large site with more than adequate room. We need the U-Haul income desparately and need to ocassionally accomodate the number of trucks indicated for short periods of time.To simply have a planner make a flat statement that the site is not large enough is wrong and unfair. I was required to submit a drawing to show the site was large enough and IT IS. I am able to have an architect/engineer so prove and would like thst opportunity - if ,necessary. My business generates one hell of a lot more tax,-revenue than the adjacent house in this low income area. Further, we have been a good and thoughtful neighbor and the adjacent resedential property owners have submitted statements in our application that the current slatted fence is adequate as far as they are concerned. Further, all government:agencies need to be ocassionally reminded that they are supposed to be servants of the people and work for the good of the people. Simply making rules that serve no real good, kill business and have no flexibility serve no one and make no sense. It would seem that government should bend to accomodate business and the goose that generates it pay check.In a construction handbook, I have seen the definition of a "strike". It is defined as "An attempt to improve egg production by strangling the chicken". Abiding by the rules and denial of my application, gentlemen, is strangling my business and our ability to generate tax revenue. I respectfully request that my application be reconsidered. Yours truly, Gurpal SIDHU Waterloo Feed and Fuel 3032 E. Waterloo Road Stockton, California 95205 GS/gw (209) 466 5816