Laserfiche WebLink
' 2.3 Contaminated Soil Removal <br /> Over excavation of contaminated soil in the vicinity of the former UST was conducted in <br />' December 1994. Approximately 108 cubic yards of contaminated soil was removed from the <br /> vicinity of the former UST and disposed of off site. <br />' 2.4 Additional Soil and Groundwater Investigation <br /> Eleven (11) soil probe holes were advanced during November 1995 and January 1996 in the <br />' vicinity of, and down-gradient from, the former UST. Soil and groundwater samples were <br /> collected to define the lateral extent of soil and groundwater contamination. Results of this <br /> investigation are presented in the Wm. J. Hunter and Associates report entitled Interim Report <br />' Covering Results of Soil and Groundwater Investigation (1996). Soil probe locations are <br /> shown in Plate III of the Interim Report (1996). Analytical results from the soil samples <br /> collected during this investigation indicated that TPH-g and BTEX were not detected (ND) <br />' above the laboratory detection limit in ten of the eleven soil probe holes (A-1, A-2, A-5, 82, B- <br /> 3, B-4, C-2, D-1, D-2, and D-3). However, soil probe A-4 located northeast of the former UST <br /> near the east side of the property contained low levels of TPH-g and BTEX at concentrations <br /> of 57, 0.116, 0.594, 1.20, and 3.54 ppm, respectively. Analytical results of the grab <br /> groundwater sample collected at 15 feet bgs from the easternmost boring 0-2 contained 59, <br /> 3.0, 24, 3.6 ppb of BTEX and 5.1 ppb TPH-g, however, these constituents were all ND in the <br /> grab groundwater sample collected at 24 feet bgs. <br />' In May 1996, a fourth groundwater monitoring well (MW-4) was installed down-gradient of the <br /> site (see Figure 2). The well was installed to a depth of approximately 25 feet, and screened <br />' from approximately 5 to 25 feet bgs. Due to rising groundwater levels, monitoring well MW-2 <br /> was no longer screened across the top of the water table and in September 1999, a fifth <br /> groundwater monitoring well (MW-5) was installed seven feet west of MW-2 to address this <br /> ' problem. MW-5 was installed to approximately 21 feet bgs and screened from approximately <br /> 5 to 20 feet bgs. <br /> ' 2.5 Groundwater Monitoring Program <br /> Groundwater monitoring at the site began in March 1994 and continued through 1999 on a <br /> ' quarterly basis, originally with three monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3. Monitoring well <br /> MW-4 was added to groundwater monitoring program in 1996 and MW-5 in 1999. Since <br /> 2000, groundwater has been monitored on an annual basis. <br /> ' Analytical results of groundwater samples from MW-2 declined from 96,000 parts per billion <br /> (ppb) TPH-g in March 1994, to 4010 ppb in December 1997, to ND in May 2002. BTEX <br /> ' components also have declined in MW-2. Benzene trended from 400ppb in 1994 to ND at the <br /> present. Analytical results of the groundwater sample from MW-5 (screened from 5 feet bgs <br /> to 25 feet bgs) were 2,500 ppb TPH-g and 60 ppb benzene in September 1999, but have <br /> since fallen considerably to ND in May 2002. The historical summary of groundwater sample <br /> results is presented in Table 2.. Current.TPH-g, BTEX, and oxygenate concentration levels . <br /> are discussed in the following section (Section 3.0). <br /> 1 <br /> ' 3 JJW GEOSCIENCES Inc. <br />