Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 25 February 2005 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No. 98-0500/04-1127 <br /> ' Page 2 of 7 <br /> diameter drive drill stems were advanced to 100 feet below surface grade (bsg), and the 6.0-inch <br /> drive drill stems were utilized to advance to a total depth of 150 feet. Starting on 05 January 2005, <br /> the pilot boring for monitoring well MW-37 was advanced using the same drilling rig;with the 8.0- <br /> inch diameter drive drill stems advanced to approximately 110 feet bsg,and the 6.0-inch drive drill <br /> stems were utilized to advance to a total depth of 200 feet. On 06 January, after advancing the 6.0- <br /> inch drive drill stems to a depth of approximately 170 feet,the drill rig experience a malfunction of <br /> the rig motor and clutch assembly and drilling stopped.The 8.0-inch diameter drive drill stems were <br /> isecured at the top of the casing and weatherproofed. The drill rig returned to the site on 11 January <br /> and began to advance the 6.0-inch drive drill stems to a depth of approximately 200 feet.Extensive <br /> sand heave was documented,which delayed the installation of the deeper well casing.The 6.0-inch <br /> drive drill stems were advanced to the total well depth on 13 January 2004. <br /> The drill rig and three-man crew were supplied by Cascade Drilling Corporation.Drill-stem returns <br /> generated by drilling and coring were containerized on plastic on the western edge of the site pending <br /> landfill disposal or treatment. Waste water from washing was stored on-site in properly labeled <br /> Department of Transportation (DOT)-approved model 17H 55-gallon drums. <br /> Soil samples were collected ahead of the drill bit from the boring for well MW-37,using a 10-foot <br /> core barrel; the samples were collected continuously in 10-foot sections, beginning at 5 feet bsg. <br /> After retrieval,a representative soil sample from each section was hand packed into a six-inch brass <br /> sleeve, and both ends of the sleeve were covered with Teflon sheets, capped and sealed with tape. <br /> The samples were properly labeled and stored with ice for chemical analysis and transported under <br /> chain of custody to a State of California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical <br /> ' laboratory. The samples were analyzed for: <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br /> ' Method 8015 Modified; <br /> • Benzene,toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes(BTEX)in accordance with EPA Method <br /> 8020; and <br /> • The fuel additives di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), methyl <br /> tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), <br /> ' 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) in accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8260 Modified. <br /> 2.1.2. Logging <br /> • Soil was manually and visually described on the boring log in accordance with the Unified Soil <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />