My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
3505
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009275
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 2:26:39 PM
Creation date
1/6/2020 1:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0009275
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004014
FACILITY_NAME
VALERO ENEREGY CORP/NUSTAR ENERGY
STREET_NUMBER
3505
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
16203003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3505 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.4.4 The leak test should include an analysis of the leak check compound. <br /> If a leak check compound is detected in the sample, the following <br /> actions should be followed: <br /> A The cause of the leak should be evaluated, determined and <br /> corrected through confirmation sampling; <br /> B. If the leak check compound is suspected or detected as a site- <br /> specific contaminant, a new leak check compound should be <br /> used; <br /> C. If leakage is confirmed and the problem can not be corrected,the <br /> soil gas probe should be properly decommissioned; <br /> D. A replacement probe should be installed at least five(5)feet from <br /> the original probe decommissioned due to confirmed leakage, or <br /> consult with Agency staff; and <br /> E. The leak check compound concentration detected in the soil gas <br /> sample should be included and discussed in the report. <br /> 2.5 Purge/Sample Flow Rate <br /> Sampling and purging flow rates should not enhance compound partitioning <br /> during soil gas sampling. Samples should not be collected if field conditions <br /> as specified in Section 2.6.4 exist. <br /> 2.5.1 The purging or sampling flow rate should be attainable in the Iithology <br /> adjacent to the soil gas probe. <br /> A To evaluate lithologic conditions adjacent to the soil gas probe <br /> (e.g., where no-flow or low-flow conditions), a vacuum gauge or <br /> similar device should be used between the soil gas sample tubing <br /> and the soil gas extraction devices (e.g., vacuum pump, Summar"" <br /> canister). <br /> B. Gas tight syringes may also be used to qualitatively determine if a <br /> high vacuum soil condition (e.g., suction is felt while the plunger is <br /> being withdrawn) is present. <br /> 2.5.2 The Agency recommends purging or sampling at rates between 100 <br /> to 200 milliliters per minute (ml/min)to limit stripping, prevent ambient <br /> air from diluting the soil gas samples, and to reduce the variability of <br /> purging rates. The low flow purge rate increases the likelihood that <br /> representative samples may be collected. The purge/sample rate <br /> may be modified based on conditions encountered in individual soil <br /> gas probes. These modified rates should be documented in the soil <br /> gas report. <br /> 01/28/2003 - 11 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.