Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />controlling load rack spills (the sump pump) has been periodi- <br />cally inoperable from April 1982 until the date of filing the <br />complaint. <br />3) Violation of §79.807(a)(8) in that defendants <br />failede to provide means to prevent overfill in that the ground <br />plug which is designed to measure the liquid level has been ino- <br />perable as of July 2, 1986 until the date of filing the <br />complaint. <br />iii. Defendants, and each of them, violated the provi- <br />sions of §4-008.5 of the Stockton Municipal Code; said acts <br />include but are not limited to the following violations of said <br />provisions: <br />1) Violation of 54-008.5 in that defendants have <br />transferred fuel without having alarms capable of alerting per- <br />sonnel of hazardous fill conditions, in that defendants have <br />intentionally attached weights to the high level alarms on the <br />tanks rendering them inoperable. <br />i) Violation of §67140 in that defendants have no con- <br />tingency plan designed to minimize hazards to human health or the <br />environment from release of hazardous waste or hazardous waste <br />constituents to air, soil, or surface water; <br />j) Violation of §67142 in that no copy of a contingency <br />plan as required by 967140 has been submitted to local police <br />departments, fire departments, hospitals, and state and local <br />emergency response teams that may be called upon to provide <br />emergency services. <br />k) Violation of §67163 in that defendants failed to main- <br />tain a written operating record and a map or diagrams describing <br />