My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2941
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518632
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 2:52:57 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 2:27:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518632
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014022
FACILITY_NAME
ST SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
2941
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2941 NAVY DR
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Mike Pitta - 2 - 19 December 2006 <br /> Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline was reported at a maximum concentration of 130 milligrams <br /> per liter (mg/L), TPH diesel at 5.4 mg/L, benzene at 9,900 micrograms per liter (ug/L), and <br /> methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) at 200,000 ug/L. Groundwater samples were collected for <br /> natural attenuation parameters in the fourth quarter 2005. Sulfate, ferrous iron, and methane <br /> were detected in source area wells at higher concentrations than the plume perimeter wells <br /> suggesting that anaerobic biodegradation of the petroleum hydrocarbons is occurring. <br /> The Soil Remediation Report describes the discharge of transmix fuel (gasoline and diesel <br /> mixture) on 24 July 2006 and associated remedial response activities. The release occurred <br /> from a pump back-pressure valve in the manifold area of the site. The volume discharged is <br /> unknown; however, approximately 160 gallons of SPH were recovered from the containment <br /> pad, surface water catch basin, and hand-excavated trenches and sumps. Approximately 450 <br /> gallons of petroleum-impacted groundwater were recovered from the remedial excavation <br /> area. Visibly stained soils were removed by hand-excavation down to the groundwater table <br /> about 3 feet deep across an area measuring 23 feet wide by 70 feet long. Approximately 189 <br /> tons of soil and surface gravel were excavated and placed in covered roll-off bins. The lateral <br /> extent of excavation was limited by existing infrastructure though stained soils related to the <br /> transmix discharge were reportedly completely removed from the vadose zone. <br /> Seventeen sidewall soil confirmation samples and two groundwater characterization samples <br /> were collected from the remedial excavation area. The samples were analyzed for benzene, <br /> toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX compounds), and five fuel oxygenates of MTBE, <br /> ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), diisopropyl ether (DIPE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), <br /> and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) using EPA Method 8260B, and TPH gasoline, TPH jet fuel, <br /> and TPH diesel using EPA Method 8015M. Maximum soil sample chemical concentrations <br /> were 29,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) TPH diesel; 9,600 mg/kg TPH gasoline; 4,000 <br /> mg/kg benzene; and 9,000 micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg) MTBE. Maximum groundwater <br /> sample chemical concentrations were 31 mg/L TPH diesel; 39 mg/L TPH gasoline; 4,800 ug/L <br /> benzene; 850 ug/L MTBE. Groundwater sample chemical concentrations were within the <br /> range of historical data from nearby monitoring well SP/M-9. Regional Water Board staff in a <br /> teleconference on 12 October 2006 concurred with KMEP's request to backfill the excavation <br /> based on complete removal of soils containing SPH. <br /> The Feasibility Study (FS) was proposed in the Soil Remediation Report to re-evaluate <br /> monitored natural attenuation (MNA) as the preferred remedial alternative to address <br /> groundwater pollution at the site. Based on the range of current manifold area soil and <br /> groundwater petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations compared with historical site data, KMEP <br /> recommended that MNA should remain as the selected remedial alternative with <br /> contingencies for SPH removal if present in the future. <br /> REGIONAL WATER BOARD REVIEW COMMENTS <br /> Figures were provided in the Annual Report tabulating groundwater chemical data for the two <br /> semiannual sampling events. Although a similar depiction was referenced in the First <br /> Semiannual Report as Figure 4, the version of Figure 4 provided in the document showed <br /> shallow groundwater elevation data for May 2005. Note that in accordance with Monitoring <br /> and Reporting Program (MRP) No. R5-2005-0815, groundwater monitoring reports should <br /> include isoconcentration contour maps for chemical constituents. These maps should be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.