Laserfiche WebLink
GEOMATRiX <br /> 3.0 DISCUSSION—PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN GROUNDWATER <br /> ' Concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) dissolved in groundwater typically are derived <br /> from laboratory analysis using a modified version of EPA Method 8015 described in the California <br /> Department of Health Services' Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Manual The TPH-D concentrations <br /> ' reported for the samples described above were derived using this method However, extraneous material <br /> may interfere with this analysis and result in reported concentrations of TPH that overstate the true <br /> ' amount of petroleum hydrocarbon dissolved in groundwater <br /> Concentrations of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon in groundwater may be overstated due to interference <br /> ' from (1) non-dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons that are adsorbed onto particulate matter that is <br /> entrained in the sample,(2) separate-phase petroleum hydrocarbon that is entrained in the sample, and/or <br /> ' (3) dissolved and non-dissolved by-products (non-petroleum hydrocarbons) of biodegradation of petro- <br /> leum hydrocarbons that are present in the groundwater These materials are extracted along with the <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon during laboratory analysis by modified EPA Method 18015 and, if <br /> tpresent, consequently are included in the reported dissolved TPH concentration As a result, the true <br /> amount of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon in groundwater may be overstated if these materials are <br /> ' present In order to evaluate if one or all of these interferences are affecting TPH concentrations, <br /> accepted methods can be used that remove these materials prior to analysis of the sample <br /> rFiltering will remove particulate matter with adsorbed petroleum hydrocarbon and separate-phase petro- <br /> leum hydrocarbon that is entrained in the sample A silica gel cleanup performed by the laboratory will <br /> ' remove 90 to 95 percent of the non-petroleum hydrocarbon by-products of biodegradation that may be <br /> present in a sample (Bruya, 1995) The results of the sample analysis following filtering and/or silica <br /> ' gel cleanup are then compared to the non-filtered sample and the filtered sample without silica gel clean- <br /> up Based on this comparison, an evaluation can be made with respect to the relative contribution of <br /> non-dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon and non-dissolved by-products to the analytical result expressed <br /> ' as TPH <br /> ' 4.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> Groundwater monitoring was performed at the site by Geomatnx on 12 May 1995 using the three <br /> ' existing monitoring wells (Figure 2) Prior to collecting groundwater samples, the water level was <br /> measured, and at least four casing volumes of water were removed from each well Field parameters <br /> ' (electrical conductivity, pH, and temperature) and the clarity of the water were monitored during <br /> purging Purging and groundwater sampling were performed using an electrical submersible pump <br /> Groundwater samples were placed in laboratory-prepared containers, placed in an ice-cooled chest, and <br /> ' transported under chain-of-custody procedures to the laboratory for chemical analysis Selected samples <br /> were filtered in the field using an in-line, positive-pressure filtration device with a 0 45 micron filter <br /> 2 <br />