My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011025
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
969
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545144
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2020 9:15:52 AM
Creation date
1/9/2020 8:48:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011025
RECORD_ID
PR0545144
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025676
FACILITY_NAME
CARNATION USA/CARNATION PLANT
STREET_NUMBER
969
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
969 E FREMONT ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> GEOMATRIX <br /> i <br /> 5.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS <br /> i <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylenes(BTEX)using EPA <br /> Method 8240 EPA Method 8020 was previously used for BTEX analysis, however, this method can <br /> produce false-positive results for these constituents EPA Method 8240 was selected for BTEX analysis <br /> because the possibility of false-positive results for these constituents is eliminated In addition, to <br /> evaluate the effects that extraneous material may be having on TPH-D analytical results and to reduce <br /> the likelihood of false positive results for TPH-D, three different groundwater samples from each <br /> monitoring well were analyzed for TPH-D using modified EPA Method 8015 as follows <br /> ' 4. a standard sample, with no preparation, <br /> • a sample filtered using a 0 45 micron filter, and <br /> 1 <br /> • a sample filtered as above and treated with a silica gel cleanup <br /> Laboratory services were provided by American Environmental Network of Pleasant Hill, California <br /> Analytical data sheets provided by the laboratory are included in Appendix A <br /> 6.0 FINDINGS <br /> Analytical results for groundwater samples collected by Geomatnx are summarized in Table 2 The <br /> analytical results indicate that non-petroleum hydrocarbon by-products of biodegradation present in the <br /> ' groundwater likely are resulting in overstated or false-positive results for TPH-D previously reported for <br /> groundwater samples collected at the site <br /> 1 BTEX were not detected in any groundwater samples collected from the wells TPH-D was not reported <br /> above the method detection limit in the groundwater sample collected from MW-2 TPH-Diwas reported <br /> in the groundwater samples from wells MW-1 and MW-3 analyzed following the standard procedure for <br /> modified EPA Method 8015 <br /> ITPH-D was reported in the filtered groundwater samples from wells MW-1 and MW-3, indicating that <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon adsorbed onto soil particles and separate-phase petroleum hydrocarbon entrained <br /> ' in the samples probably are not a factor In contributing to the reported TPH-D concentration However, <br /> TPH-D was not detected in groundwater samples filtered in the field and cleaned up with silica gel prior <br /> Ito laboratory analysis, indicating that non-petroleum hydrocarbon by-products of biodegradation were <br /> present in the groundwater samples collected from these two wells and are resulting in an overstatement <br /> of the TPH-D results j <br /> 3 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.