Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> GEOMATRIX <br /> i <br /> 5.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS <br /> i <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylenes(BTEX)using EPA <br /> Method 8240 EPA Method 8020 was previously used for BTEX analysis, however, this method can <br /> produce false-positive results for these constituents EPA Method 8240 was selected for BTEX analysis <br /> because the possibility of false-positive results for these constituents is eliminated In addition, to <br /> evaluate the effects that extraneous material may be having on TPH-D analytical results and to reduce <br /> the likelihood of false positive results for TPH-D, three different groundwater samples from each <br /> monitoring well were analyzed for TPH-D using modified EPA Method 8015 as follows <br /> ' 4. a standard sample, with no preparation, <br /> • a sample filtered using a 0 45 micron filter, and <br /> 1 <br /> • a sample filtered as above and treated with a silica gel cleanup <br /> Laboratory services were provided by American Environmental Network of Pleasant Hill, California <br /> Analytical data sheets provided by the laboratory are included in Appendix A <br /> 6.0 FINDINGS <br /> Analytical results for groundwater samples collected by Geomatnx are summarized in Table 2 The <br /> analytical results indicate that non-petroleum hydrocarbon by-products of biodegradation present in the <br /> ' groundwater likely are resulting in overstated or false-positive results for TPH-D previously reported for <br /> groundwater samples collected at the site <br /> 1 BTEX were not detected in any groundwater samples collected from the wells TPH-D was not reported <br /> above the method detection limit in the groundwater sample collected from MW-2 TPH-Diwas reported <br /> in the groundwater samples from wells MW-1 and MW-3 analyzed following the standard procedure for <br /> modified EPA Method 8015 <br /> ITPH-D was reported in the filtered groundwater samples from wells MW-1 and MW-3, indicating that <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon adsorbed onto soil particles and separate-phase petroleum hydrocarbon entrained <br /> ' in the samples probably are not a factor In contributing to the reported TPH-D concentration However, <br /> TPH-D was not detected in groundwater samples filtered in the field and cleaned up with silica gel prior <br /> Ito laboratory analysis, indicating that non-petroleum hydrocarbon by-products of biodegradation were <br /> present in the groundwater samples collected from these two wells and are resulting in an overstatement <br /> of the TPH-D results j <br /> 3 <br /> 1 <br />