Laserfiche WebLink
C�ealogfcalrechxacsln� Page 2 <br /> i <br /> Valley Wholesale Drug Company <br /> Protect No 989 2 <br /> November 8,2004 <br /> i <br /> In an attempt to further define the limits of soil and groundwater contamination three (3) <br /> ' GeoProbe borings were placed on the site on August 25, 1998 The results of the work are <br /> outlined in the Hunter report Interim Report Covering Results of Site Investigation <br /> Placement of SoillWater Probes—September 28, 1998 <br /> ' On August 15, 2000, three (3) additional groundwater-monitoring wells were installed at the <br /> site Details of the work are discussed in Hunter report Interim Report Covering Results of <br /> ' Site Investigation, Placement of SoillWater Probes & Groundwater Monitoring Results <br /> Valley Wholesale Drug Co —October, 2000 <br /> ' On October 5, 2001, VWDC received a directive from Jeffrey Wong, SJCEHD The letter <br /> required VWDC to define the extent of the contamination plume and submit a work plan to <br /> SJCEHD by November 20, 2001 Geological Technics Inc (GTI) requested an extension for <br /> ' the work plan submittal On November 5, 2001, Mr Wong granted the extension to <br /> December 5, 2001 <br /> ' The work plan was submitted on November 21, 2001 and was approved by Mr Jeffrey Wong <br /> in a letter dated February 27, 2002 <br /> During the third quarter of 2002 GTI installed one deep and three shallow monitoring wells at <br /> the VWDC site Soil samples were collected during the installation of the wells and the <br /> ' monitoring wells were developed 72 hours after installation The new wells were surveyed in <br /> accordance with AB2886 and placed on the existing groundwater monitoring routine <br /> ' On October 31, 2002, GTI submitted the Site Characterization — Monitoring Well <br /> Installation and 3rd Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report discussing the installation of <br /> the new wells and characterize the site conditions The report recommended two additional <br /> ' quarters of monitoring and then considers the site for closure No response was given to the <br /> recommendations in this report <br /> ' On January 21, 2003, GTI prepared and submitted a Work Plan for Geophysical Analysis <br /> On February 17, 2003 GTI requested a response from SJCEHD In a letter dated March 8, <br /> 2003, Mr Wong approved the work plan <br /> On December 17, 2003, GTI prepared and submitted a Site Conceptual Model Report (SCM) <br /> ' again requesting that the site be considered for closure On February 16, 2004 GTI requested <br /> a response from SJCEHD on the recommendations in the SCM In a letter dated March 12, <br /> 2004 Mr Wong denied the request for closure and directed VWDC to submit a work plan to <br /> define the extent of the groundwater contamination <br /> i <br /> On March 29, 2004, GTI prepared and submitted a Work Plan for Additional Site <br /> Characterization In a letter dated April 26, 2004 Mr Wong approved the work plan The <br /> 1 i <br /> I ' <br />