Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF CALIFORNIA I%kd PETE WILSON, Governor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD— 4% <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION m <br /> g <br /> 3443 ROUTIER ROAD, SUITE A , <br /> SACRAMENTO, CA 95827-3098 <br /> PHONE: (916) 361-5600 <br /> FAX: (916) 361-5686 <br /> HE ' %E . b <br /> 20 July 1992 J UL 2 3 1992 <br /> �NVIRONMWAL HEALTH <br /> PERM ITMOYIOO <br /> Ms. Diane Hinson <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> P.O. Box 2009 <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 <br /> NOR-CAL BEVERAGE, 1800 E. FREMONT ST. , STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the file for 1800 East Fremont in Stockton. Nor-Cal 's request <br /> for closure is premature. The file revealed that 3 underground tanks were <br /> removed in January 1991 and soil samples from the walls and bottom of the <br /> excavation contained up to 30,000 ppb TPHg at a depth of 10.5 feet. The tank <br /> pit was reexcavated in March 1991 . Sample #6, collected at a depth of 21 <br /> feet, contained 6000 ppb TPHg and 1100 ppb TPHd, Sample #7 contained 27000 ppb <br /> TPHg and 9100 ppb TPHd at 11 .5 feet, and Sample #11 contained 23000 ppb TPHg <br /> and 2000 ppb TPHd at 16 feet. <br /> One monitoring well , MW1, was installed through the tank pit in May 1991 . <br /> Depth to ground water was approximately 69 feet and soils consist <br /> predominantly of sands and silty sands. Only 100 ppb benzene was found in one , <br /> soil sample from the bore hole. In the ground water sample, 100 ppb TPHg and <br /> 1 .6 ppb benzene were detected. The well was sampled again in September 1991 <br /> and it contained up to 220 ppb TPHg and 0.8 ppb benzene. In a ground water <br /> sample collected in January 1992, no hydrocarbons were detected. Depth to <br /> ground water was again about 69 feet. <br /> Because of the extremely high levels of soil contamination left in place and <br /> the sandy nature of the soils, one well is not adequate to complete the ground <br /> water investigation. In sandy soils it is common for hydrocarbon <br /> contamination to impact only a narrow column of soil as the contamination <br /> moves downward toward the water table. MW1 was not installed in an area with <br /> high levels of soil contamination. It is not possible to calculate the <br /> direction of ground water flow with one well . <br /> At least two more wells are necessary to determine the direction of ground <br /> water flow. Additional wells may be needed to determine the extent of ground <br /> water contamination. All wells must be sampled quarterly and the results <br /> reported as per Section 2652(d) of the Underground Tank Regulations. <br /> The soil contamination left in the excavation remains a threat to ground <br /> water. Therefore, the extent of soil contamination must be defined. Once the <br /> soil contamination has been defined an appropriate remediation method must be <br /> proposed and implemented. <br />