Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY <br /> Soil contamination was documented following the removal of three underground storage tanks (USTs) <br /> from the site in January, 1991. Subsequent soil and groundwater investigations were undertaken to <br /> determine the extent of contamination. Two source removal excavation actions succeeded in removing <br /> all residual soil contamination. <br /> Very minor groundwater impact (benzene at appx. 1 ppb or less, TPHg non-detect to appx. 200 ppb) <br /> was detected in the initial samples collected in 1991 from monitoring well MW1. This well was <br /> installed within the former tankpit excavation. Subsequent sampling of the well in 1992 and 1993 <br /> resulted in reported concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes ranging from non-detectable <br /> to below 10 parts per billion (ppb) with no associated benzene or detectable TPHg. Groundwater <br /> sampling in 1993 from a hydropunch boring located downgradient of MW1 did not detect any <br /> contaminants. <br /> Following the completion of the hydropunch investigation, PHS/EHD concluded that all appropriate <br /> response actions had been completed and that no further investigation or remediation would be required. <br /> In a letter dated 8/12193, PHS/EHD recommended case closure to the CVRWQCB. In a response <br /> dated 9/22193, the CVRWQCB asked for a water supply well survey and an explanation of the method <br /> used to determine groundwater gradient prior to their consideration of the case for closure. This <br /> information was provided in a report prepared by RESNA dated 12120/93. PHS/EHD responded <br /> (1/19/94) by requesting the installation of at least two additional monitoring wells at the site. Further <br /> clarification of the validity of gradient determination was subsequently provided to PHS/EHD and it was <br /> agreed that two additional rounds of groundwater sampling would be sufficient to confirm the lack of <br /> groundwater impact. <br /> Recently, two consecutive rounds of groundwater sampling from MW 1 did not detect contaminants in <br /> groundwater beneath the site. <br /> Information on site geology and hydrogeology, nearby well locations and construction as well as <br /> tabulated analytical data are contained in the reports included as Attachment A. Agency correspondence <br /> is included as Attachment B. <br /> INVESTIGATION <br /> Soil <br /> In March 1991, source removal excavation was conducted in the former tank pit. Following the <br /> completion of excavation, fourteen soil samples were collected from the walls and floor of the pit and <br /> the pit was backfilled. The samples were analyzed for TPHg, total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel - <br /> (TPHd) and BTEX. Several samples were reported to contain elevated concentrations of analytes, <br /> which indicated that soil contamination remained near the middle of the former 10,000 gallon UST and <br /> beneath the center of the former 500 gallon UST. <br /> i 2 <br />