Laserfiche WebLink
CA � BA <br /> Lead analysis- Lead scavengers were a part of a"lead package"that was added to gasoline as an <br /> anti-knock package prior to 1991 The "lead package" consisted of EDB, 1,2-DCA, and one or <br /> more lead compounds If the 1,2-DCA detected in groundwater beneath the subject site <br /> originates from a fuel release at the subject site then we would expect to find the other associated <br /> "lead package" compounds (EDB and lead) in soil and groundwater beneath the site EDB has <br /> not been detected in any soil samples collected from this site Soil samples collected during this <br /> investigation were analyzed for lead to determine if elevated lead levels are present in the <br /> vicinity of the site containing the highest 1,2-DCA levels in groundwater (the well S-1 area) <br /> Soil samples were collected in the vicinity of well S-1 (from SB-19) and soil samples were also <br /> collected from an offsite boring (SB-20) to provide background lead levels in soil The lead data <br /> indicates that there are no elevated lead levels in the vicinity of well S-1 when compared to <br /> background lead levels <br /> While the lack of detectable levels of 1,2-DCA, EDB, and lead in soil near well S-1 does not <br /> exclude the possibility that the 1,2-DCA originates from a release at the Shell site, it is part of a <br /> growing body of evidence that suggest the 1,2-DCA may be from another source <br /> 1,2-DCA Distribution Figure 2 shows the concentration of 1,2-DCA in groundwater from the <br /> most recent grab groundwater samples as well as groundwater samples from the monitoring <br /> wells Low levels of 1,2-DCA were detected in groundwater samples east of the site (SB-23, <br /> SB-24, and SB-25) and slightly higher levels of 1,2-DCA were detected in groundwater from the <br /> bonngs located south of the site (SB-20, SB-21, and SB-22) The highest levels of 1,2-DCA are <br /> found in well S-1, near the northern property boundary Overall the data on Figure 2 shows that <br /> 1,2-DCA concentrations decline with distance away from the site and also decline with depth <br /> Interim Remeduition: Interim groundwater extraction (GWE) was attempted at this site with <br /> the understanding that the existing well network was not ideal for pumping groundwater and <br /> monitoring aquifer response The primary objective of interim GWE was to remove 1,2-DCA <br /> mass from the groundwater Interim GWE removed 0 019 pounds of 1,2-DCA by extracting <br /> 6,455 gallons of groundwater over 10 days The 1,2-DCA chemical analytical data collected <br /> during the test do not suggest there was a significant decline in concentration in either S-1 or 5-1- <br /> 85 The two quarterly monitoring events conducted after the interim remedial activities show a <br /> slight decline in 1,2-DCA concentration in well S-1, and no significant change in 5-1-85 At this <br /> point, it does not appear that interim GWE was effective However, we will continue to monitor <br /> the 1,2-DCA data in well S-1 to determine if this declining trend continues and evaluate if this is <br /> a result of interim GWE <br /> 0797 11 <br />