Laserfiche WebLink
at the subject site was terminated at a depth of 35 5 fbg Thus, ground water would occur at a depth <br /> of 40 5 fbg according to SJCPHS Cambria is not aware of any site specific depth to ground water <br /> information for this site Because of the discrepancies in depth to ground water information for the <br /> subject site, Cambria contacted the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation <br /> District (SJCFCWCD) to find out what information they may have for depth to ground water in the <br /> vicinity of the subject site The closest well to the subject site that SJCFCWCD monitors is a well at <br /> Gianone County Park, approximately 3/4 of a mile north of the subject site The depth to water in <br /> this well as of March 1998 is 49 fbg It remains unclear at this point what the actual depth to ground <br /> water is beneath this site <br /> Cost-Effective Approach <br /> SJCPHS commented that the investigative approach outlined in Cambria's Work Plan is not a cost- <br /> effective approach for this case The most cost-effective approach for dealing with a case where soil <br /> has been impacted by hydrocarbons but ground water is not know to be impacted, is to investigate the <br /> vertical extent of hydrocarbons in the soil Should it be found that hydrocarbons do not extent to <br /> the depth where ground water occurs then the case should be considered a soils-only case Not only is <br /> this a cost-effective approach, it is also a common investigative technique based on a scientifically <br /> defensible methodology To install ground water monitoring wells only to find out that ground water <br /> has not been impacted and then to close the case as a soils-only case is not a cost-effective approach <br /> Well installation could be avoided by focusing the initial investigation on the vertical extent of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons beneath the source area This is the approach used in Cambria's work plan <br /> Work Plan Addendum <br /> Cambria agrees with SJCPHS that if ground water occurs five feet below the depth where Boring SB-2 <br /> was terminated it is possible ground water has been impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons and at <br /> ground water monitoring well installation is warranted However, due to the discrepancy in depth to <br /> water information for the vicinity of the site, Cambria proposes the following alteration to our <br /> February 28, 1998 Work Plan <br /> I <br /> One soil boring_will be drilled adjacent to the northern-most dispenser island to define the vertical <br /> extent of_petroleumhydrocarbons in the soil and to determine the depth at which ground water <br /> occurs beneath the site Should ground water be encountered at 40 fbg, the boring will be converted <br /> to a ground water monitoring well and two additional ground water monitoring wells will be installed <br /> at the site as proposed in Cambria's February 28, 1998 Work Plan <br /> If during the drilling of this boring ground water is encountered at a depth &MsLter than 40 fb and <br /> field evidence indicates that petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil_extends_to the_deoth where around <br /> water occurs, the boring will be converted to a ground water monitoring well and two additional <br /> 240-0797 2 <br />