Laserfiche WebLink
Bioprocess Monitoring ov <br /> Regardless of whether a bioremediation project is actively performed or allowed to proceed <br /> through nonaction (i.e., passive), it is important that periodic bioprocess monitoring be per- <br /> formed to ensure that appropriate physical, chemical, and biological conditions are established <br /> and/or maintained during the course of a bioremediation project. The results of bioprocess <br /> analyses, in correlation with the results of analytical (contaminant) testing, can provide informa- <br /> tion that may be utilized to modify treatment protocol (active approach), if indicated, in order to <br /> maximize bioremedial efficiency and/or induce desired operational effects. As previously indi- <br /> cated, BioLogic performs routine physicochemical and microbiological testing as part of bio- <br /> process monitoring activities. Physicochemical analyses include pH, nitrogen (nitrate, nitrite, <br /> ammoni <br /> a), phosphates, and potassium. Microbial analyses include both general (heterotrophic) <br /> and selective (contaminant-degrader) enumerations. Subsequent to each bioprocess monitoring <br /> event, we provide our clients with timely data interpretations and recommendations based on <br /> these analyses, providing guidance toward achieving project remediation success. For additional <br /> L information on bioprocess monitoring, please refer to The Significance and Benefits of Micro- <br /> biological and Physicochemical Tracking in the Bioremedial Process documentation. <br /> v- Biotreatment Recommendations ow <br /> Effective implementation of bioremediation demands a thorough understanding of the myriad of <br /> parameters at work in the bioremedial process. Prior to initiating any bioremedial approach, it is <br /> important to evaluate the environmental (microbiological/physicochemical) and physical (geo- <br /> technical) parameters which can influence overall project efficacy. Based upon the cumulative <br /> results of site characterization, microbiologicaUphysicochemical/analytical parameter evaluations <br /> and/or biotreatability investigations, BioLogic can provide recommendations beginning with the <br /> selection of the most appropriate bioremedial approach (if any). Once the feasibility of a method <br /> is validated and a course of action has been determined, BioLogic can provide biotreatment <br /> guidance, project tracking and problem resolution, providing the client with all the information <br /> required to make technically sound treatment decisions. Listed below is a brief description of the <br /> more common biotreatment approaches utilized in the industry today. For additional information <br /> on standard biological approaches, please refer to our publication Initial Site Characterization <br /> Parameters and Biotechnical Analyses in Determination of Compatibility and Feasibility for <br /> An In Situ or Ex Situ Bioremedial Approach. <br /> Bioremedial Treatment Approaches <br /> Passive/Intrinsic - nonaction; monitor with little or no physical interaction; primarily <br /> reliant on reduced conditions and anaerobic processes; Natural Attenuation/RBCA - <br /> includes consideration of parameters such as dilution, sorption, and migratory activity <br /> (fate and transport) of potential receptors; <br /> Active - stimulate/enhance activity of indigenous microbial populations via supplementa- <br /> tion with nutrients, oxygen, moisture, etc.; includes mechanical technologies (i.e., air <br /> sparging bioventing) - reliant on microbial activity and nutrient availability/utilization; <br /> bioaugmentation - introduction of exogenous commercial microbes and/or reintroduction <br /> of cultivated indigenous organisms. <br /> 9 <br />