Laserfiche WebLink
S � � <br /> r� <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C . <br /> i <br /> REMEDIAL ALTERNATNES -- GROUND WATER <br /> ATC evaluated four remedial alternatives to further,reduce petroleum hydrocarbons in the ground water <br /> beneath the Subject Property. The alternatives includ' pump and treat, air sparging, natural attenuation and <br /> enhanced natural attenuation. <br /> i <br /> LPump and Treat <br /> This remedial approach involves pumping of.ground water to the Lsurface for treatment. It would require the <br /> installation of additional four-inch diameter extraction wells. Prior to installation of the extraction wells, <br /> aquifer testing using existing monitoring wells would be conducted to determine aquifer characteristics. The 1 <br /> results would be used to determine the most affective pumping rate, capture zone, draw down, and design of the <br /> extraction wells. <br /> A variable speed electrical. pump would be placed in each extraction well. Ground water would be placed in a <br /> surface holding tank prior to treatment. The ground water would then be pumped through dual 1,000-pound <br /> activated carbon vessels to remove gasoline hydrocarbons. The discharge from the first carbon vessel would be <br /> periodically analyzed to-establish carbon breakthrough. Treated water would be discharged into the sanitary <br /> sewer system if allowed'by the City of Stockton. If the City of Stockton will not issue a discharge permit, the <br /> extracted water would be disposed of off-site at a liquid recycling facility. <br /> Air Sparging <br /> This remedial approach'�for accelerated cleanup involves injecting air into the ground water table. An air <br /> compressor capable of delivering 10 cubic feet per minute (cfm) at 20 pounds per square inch (psi) would be <br /> utilized to inject air into the ground water table. The:injected air serves two purposes: 1) removing gasoline <br /> hydrocarbons from the saturated soil and ground water by air stripping, and 2) providing increased oxygen to <br /> the ground water to promote bacterial action to degrade the hydrocarbons. ATC would need to install a soil <br /> vapor extraction(SVE) system to remove the stripped hydrocarbons from above the water table. a <br /> In addition to the air sparging wells, the three existing two-inch-diameter vapor extraction wells would be <br /> utilized in order to ensure the capture of the hydrocarbons stripped from the saturated zone. All of the wells <br /> would be plumbed to the treatment system area. The two-inch-diameter vapor extraction wells would be <br /> plumbed into the vapor extraction manifold. The air sparging wells would be manifolded into an industrial duty <br /> air compressor. Solenoid valves and timers would be used to cycle the compressed air between the air sparging <br /> wells to prevent preferential air channeling and to maximize the efficiency of the system. A series of filters <br /> would be used to prevent any contaminants in the compressed air stream from,impacting the ground water. <br /> Water samples would be collected and analyzed from the existing ground water monitoring wells to evaluate <br /> the effectiveness of the treatment system. Dissolved oxygen and pressure readings would be measured in all of <br /> the ground water monitoring wells to provide an indication of the radial influence of the air sparging wells. In <br /> addition, vapor concentrations of the influent to the extraction system would be monitored monthly. <br /> The SVE system wouldbe operated to remove the hydrocarbons being stripped from the saturated zone by the <br /> air sparging system. An estimated 1,000 to 2,000 pounds of carbon would be required for six months of system <br /> operation. Vapor samples would be obtained from the SVE system during operation to chart the remediation <br /> Diesel Performance January 5,2004 <br /> ATC Project Number 5462577 Page 6 <br />