Laserfiche WebLink
Project No.013-10141 <br /> Page No. 7 <br /> may or may not be required, however, depending on site-specific conditions and considerations. <br /> As stated by the RWQCB, the ESL document may be especially beneficial for use at sites with limited <br /> impacts, where the preparation of a formal environmental assessment may not be warranted or feasible <br /> due to time and cost constraints. In addition, some constituents are not addressed under the RWQCB <br /> ESL,therefore,USEPA Regional Screening Levels were utilized. <br /> A discussion of the results of the LSI is summarized below: Where applicable, the RWQCB ESLs and <br /> ESEPA RSLs for shallow soil in commercial/industrial settings were used to evaluate soil for potential <br /> environmental concern or further evaluation. <br /> • The soil sample collected adjacent to the location of the inactive equipment wash drain located <br /> within the southern portion of the site building(B-1@5')was reported as ND for TPH-g, TPH-d, <br /> and VOCs. Soil samples collected from the locations of the inactive clarifier located within the <br /> southern portion of the site building (B-1@10' and B-2@10') were reported with concentrations <br /> of TPH-g that are above the RWQCB ESL of 180 mg/kg for gasoline petroleum hydrocarbons; <br /> however, TPH-d was reported as ND for both samples. Concentrations of VOCs reported above <br /> their respective ESLs included the following: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (ESL of 1.6 mg/kg), 1,4- <br /> Dichlorobenzene (ESL of 1.8 mg/kg), Napthalene (ESL of 2.8 mg/kg), and 1,1,2,2- <br /> Tetrachloroethane (ESL of 0.60 mg/kg). Therefore, it appears that concentrations of TPH-g and <br /> various detected VOCs,including chlorinated solvents above their respective RWQCB ESLs and <br /> RSLs,were detected in the subsurface soils beneath the inactive clarifier. <br /> • Soil samples collected adjacent to the locations of the active clarifier, equipment wash rack and <br /> drain located within the northern portion of the site building(B-4@ 10',B-5@10', and B-6,B-7, <br /> B-8, B-9, and B-10@3') were reported as ND for TPH-g, TPH-d, TEPH, and LUFT metals, <br /> except for less than significant concentrations of 13 mg/kg of TPH-g detected in sample B- <br /> 4@10',which are below the RWQCB ESL of 180 mg/kg for TPH-g. <br /> • Concentrations of heavy metals detected in the soil samples collected adjacent to the clarifiers, <br /> drains, and wash rack were below their respective ESLs and RSLs, and are therefore not <br /> considered to pose a significant threat to human health and/or the environment within the areas <br /> where samples were collected and analyzed. <br /> 8.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the results of this investigation, it appears that subsurface impacts from hazardous <br /> materials/wastes have occurred in the area of the on-site inactive equipment wash clarifier investigated by <br /> Krazan. Based on the analytical results, concentrations of TPH-g and various detected VOCs including <br /> the chlorinated solvent Tetrachloroethane above their respective RWQCB ESLs and RSLs, were detected <br /> in the subsurface soils beneath the inactive clarifier. The vertical extent of impact from TPH-g and VOCs <br /> beneath the inactive clarifier is currently unknown; however, deeper samples (B-1 and B-2@15 and 20 <br /> feet bgs)were collected by Krazan at the time of the field investigation for this assessment and placed on <br /> KRAZAN&ASSOCIATES,INC. <br /> Conducting Assessments Nationwide <br /> 1310141 WW R®tats LSI DRAFr.doc <br />