Laserfiche WebLink
C L E A kWA'T-ER <br />' G R O U P <br /> Envirnnmenfu! Services <br /> relatively ineffectual because the majority of sorbed-phase contamination is submerged beneath <br />' the water table The effectiveness of soil vapor extraction on sorbed-phase contamination <br /> beneath the water table is limited unless used in conjunction with groundwater extraction (GWE) <br /> to depress the water table or air sparging (AS) to strip volatiles from the dissolved-phase and <br /> induce continued partitioning of contaminants from the sorbed- to dissolved-phase for clean-up <br />' Field data collected during the March, 2002 SVE pilot testing at the subject site suggests that, in <br /> combination with AS and GWE, SVE could be a feasible, though not ideal technology at the site <br />' Based on data collected during the March, 2002 pilot test it is estimated that, if chosen, this <br /> option would likely require the installation of up to 12 additional combination GWE/SVE wells <br />' and 4 AS wells (Figure 7) This estimate assumes radius of influence will increase with <br /> depression of the water table through GWE It is likely that existing monitoring wells MW-1, <br />' MW-3, and MW-4 may also be used for the purposes of soil vapor extraction during remediation <br /> Use of SVE would also require treatment of the vapors before emission to ambient air The local <br /> Air Pollution Control District requires destruction efficiencies typically achieved by the <br /> following treatment technologies internal combustion engine, thermal oxidation, catalytic <br /> oxidation, and carbon adsorption Based on the limited areal extent and relatively moderate <br /> residual sorbed-phase concentrations, either catalytic oxidation or carbon adsorption would likely <br />' be sufficient treatment technologies for the anticipated air flowrates and contaminant <br /> concentrations on the influent air stream Most likely a beginning phase with a catalytic <br />' oxidation system followed by carbon adsorption phase of operation once influent concentrations <br /> had dropped off <br /> iHowever, carbon adsorption would likely be the appropriate treatment technology if SVE were <br /> used to recover air sparge vapors and remediate what little sorbed-phase contamination would be <br /> left following excavation of contaminated soil <br />' 6.3 Remedial Alternatives for Groundwater <br />' 6 3 1 Air S ar in In-situ Volatilization <br /> This technique uses air injection (air sparging) to introduce relatively large volumes of air into <br /> the groundwater in order to volatilize the dissolved phase hydrocarbons In-situ volatilization is <br /> ZB178C CAP 14 November 20,2002 <br />