My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002480
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FRESNO
>
1817
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540859
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002480
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 4:14:00 PM
Creation date
1/15/2020 3:04:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002480
RECORD_ID
PR0540859
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023361
FACILITY_NAME
PLAY N PARK (FORMER BARNES TRUCKING)
STREET_NUMBER
1817
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
FRESNO
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1817 S FRESNO AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C L E A kWA'T-ER <br />' G R O U P <br /> Envirnnmenfu! Services <br /> relatively ineffectual because the majority of sorbed-phase contamination is submerged beneath <br />' the water table The effectiveness of soil vapor extraction on sorbed-phase contamination <br /> beneath the water table is limited unless used in conjunction with groundwater extraction (GWE) <br /> to depress the water table or air sparging (AS) to strip volatiles from the dissolved-phase and <br /> induce continued partitioning of contaminants from the sorbed- to dissolved-phase for clean-up <br />' Field data collected during the March, 2002 SVE pilot testing at the subject site suggests that, in <br /> combination with AS and GWE, SVE could be a feasible, though not ideal technology at the site <br />' Based on data collected during the March, 2002 pilot test it is estimated that, if chosen, this <br /> option would likely require the installation of up to 12 additional combination GWE/SVE wells <br />' and 4 AS wells (Figure 7) This estimate assumes radius of influence will increase with <br /> depression of the water table through GWE It is likely that existing monitoring wells MW-1, <br />' MW-3, and MW-4 may also be used for the purposes of soil vapor extraction during remediation <br /> Use of SVE would also require treatment of the vapors before emission to ambient air The local <br /> Air Pollution Control District requires destruction efficiencies typically achieved by the <br /> following treatment technologies internal combustion engine, thermal oxidation, catalytic <br /> oxidation, and carbon adsorption Based on the limited areal extent and relatively moderate <br /> residual sorbed-phase concentrations, either catalytic oxidation or carbon adsorption would likely <br />' be sufficient treatment technologies for the anticipated air flowrates and contaminant <br /> concentrations on the influent air stream Most likely a beginning phase with a catalytic <br />' oxidation system followed by carbon adsorption phase of operation once influent concentrations <br /> had dropped off <br /> iHowever, carbon adsorption would likely be the appropriate treatment technology if SVE were <br /> used to recover air sparge vapors and remediate what little sorbed-phase contamination would be <br /> left following excavation of contaminated soil <br />' 6.3 Remedial Alternatives for Groundwater <br />' 6 3 1 Air S ar in In-situ Volatilization <br /> This technique uses air injection (air sparging) to introduce relatively large volumes of air into <br /> the groundwater in order to volatilize the dissolved phase hydrocarbons In-situ volatilization is <br /> ZB178C CAP 14 November 20,2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.