Laserfiche WebLink
Charles Skobrak 3_ <br /> Claim No. 1028 ... ..� May 21, 2008 <br /> B. In-Situ Soil Remediation: <br /> • METHOD: soil vapor extraction pilot test has been performed and SVE <br /> system is proposed <br /> C. Groundwater Remediation: none identified <br /> D. Groundwater Trends: <br /> • Benzene trends are shown below <br /> Claim 1028 <br /> 160000 <br /> 140000 <br /> c 120000 <br /> rn —•—M W 4 <br /> 8 100000 <br /> 80000 VW 2b <br /> N 60000 VW-3 <br /> 40000 <br /> m -1 >. <br /> 20000 <br /> 0 — <br /> Off` X00 Oy �O�O OHO `O'1 <br /> �`a 5zQ �a 5eQ �a �eQ �a gzQ �a <br /> Time <br /> VII. SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY: two wells identified within '/2 mile of the site <br /> VIII. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description: retail gasoline station <br /> B. Site History: the extent of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> C. Groundwater Monitoring Summary: strong monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: none conducted after 16 years of investigation <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> California En vironmental Protection Agency <br /> • p.�Recyc/edPaper <br />