Laserfiche WebLink
ATC Associates Inc. <br /> %T(: 1117 Lone Palm Avenue,Suite 201 <br /> Modesto,California 95351 <br /> 209-579-2221 <br /> fax:209-579-2225 <br /> ASS O C I ATE S I N C . <br /> hydrocarbons were not detected at or above laboratory reported detection limits in the <br /> groundwater samples collected from MW-1, MW-2, or MW-3. <br /> On April 19, 1988, an additional monitoring well (MW-4) was installed north of the former <br /> location of the USTs. Based on Kleinfelder's Additional Monitoring Well report dated April 22, <br /> 1998, petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the groundwater sample collected from MW-4 <br /> on April 19, 1988. <br /> In late April 1988, the open excavation associated with the former USTs was expanded by <br /> excavating petroleum impacted vadose zone soils. As reported in Kleinfelder's Soil Removal <br /> Report dated May 3, 1988, approximately 350 to 400 cubic yards of soil were excavated from <br /> April 25 to 28, 1988. Laboratory analyses of soil samples collected from the sidewalls of the <br /> enlarged excavation indicated low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons remained at the <br /> south and southeastern portion of the excavation. <br /> On February 26, 1993, Parker Environmental Services (P.E.S.) advanced seven soil borings (BH- <br /> 1 through BH-7). Soil samples were collected from each boring and a groundwater sample was <br /> collected from each boring except BH-7. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples <br /> collected from all the borings except BH-1 and BH-3. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in <br /> all of the groundwater samples. Water levels measured at the site on March 2, 1993, indicated the <br /> groundwater flow direction was to the southeast. Refer to P.E.S.'s Interim Report on Subsurface <br /> Investigation Work at Cheaper! #37 dated April 20, 1993 for more details. <br /> From July to October 1995, P.E.S. conducted subsurface investigation activities that included <br /> installing four monitoring wells (MW-5 through MW-8) on-site and advancing 14 hand augured <br /> soil borings (B-8 through B-21). Borings B-15 through B-21 were advanced off-site to the west, <br /> southwest, and south. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 6.5 feet bgs. Soil and <br /> groundwater samples were collected from B-8, B-10 through B-18, B-20, B-21, and MW-5 <br /> through MW-7. A groundwater sample was also collected from MW8. Petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> were detected in all of the soil samples except for the samples collected from MW-5 through <br /> MW-7, B-14 located east of the former UST location, and B-20 and B-21 located off-site to the <br /> southwest and south, respectively. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the groundwater <br /> samples except the samples collected from B-14, B-20, B-21, MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-6, and <br /> MW-7. MW-4 was not sampled due to the presence of approximately 0.02 inches of free <br /> product. Refer to the report prepared by P.E.S. titled Environmental Site Investigation Methods <br /> and Findings: Drilling of Soil Borings, Drilling and Installation of Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Wells Collection and Analyses of Soil and Groundwater Samples, dated November 17, 1995 for <br /> more information. <br /> In a letter dated April 11, 2002, the SJCEHD indicated that upgradient monitoring wells MW-2 <br /> and MW-3 could be reduced to annual monitoring and that the lateral and vertical extent of soil <br /> contamination remains undefined. <br /> SAEnvironmenta1\25847\37 Tracy\Reports\Response 2009 Aug.doc 2 <br />