My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DR OM AGREEMENT 2017 JANUARY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GREAT VALLEY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542222
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DR OM AGREEMENT 2017 JANUARY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:05:32 PM
Creation date
1/27/2020 2:25:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DR OM AGREEMENT 2017 JANUARY
RECORD_ID
PR0542222
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0024253
FACILITY_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE DEVELOPERS-SHEA HOMES
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
GREAT VALLEY
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
Zip
95391
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
GREAT VALLEY PKWY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Removal Action <br /> APN 209-450-03,Mountain House,CA <br /> Page 4 <br /> State the problem: The purpose of the sampling program is to determine if the proposed Site is <br /> acceptable for a residential development. Although the proposed development of the Site will result in <br /> asphalt or concrete surfacing over the much of the Site, landscaped areas will include native soils where <br /> resident exposure may occur. Previous investigations have included evaluation of potential contamination <br /> based on historical use of the property. <br /> Identify the Decision: The data obtained from the sampling and testing activities will be used to evaluate <br /> if releases of hazardous substances from historical uses have occurred at the Site. The data results will be <br /> further evaluated to assess the relative threat associated with any found contamination through a screening <br /> risk evaluation. Based on the calculation of human health and ecological risks for the Site, the suitability <br /> of the property for its intended development will be determined. <br /> Identify Inputs to the Decision: Inputs to the decision will include laboratory analytical results of <br /> analytical testing of soils from selected locations on the Site. The soil will be tested for dieldrin as <br /> discussed in Section 2.0 and the RAW. <br /> Define the Study Boundaries: The boundaries of the field sampling and analysis program will be the <br /> perimeter of the Site and waste soil encapsulation area as detailed in the RAW. <br /> Develop a Decision Rule: Decisions will be based on laboratory results for the target constituents <br /> presented in Tables 1 through 3, attached. If no valid detectable concentrations of target compounds are <br /> reported for the collected samples, then a decision will be made that the Site has been adequately <br /> characterized with respect to the Site COC and no further sampling will be required as part of the RAW. <br /> If target constituents are detected in the samples tested, then the data will be evaluated as detailed in <br /> Section 2.2,Data Use. <br /> Specify Limits on Decision Error: The results of analytical testing will be subjected to data validation <br /> on selected data if required by DTSC, as specified in Section 8.3. Data are considered to be valid if the <br /> specified limits on precision, accuracy,representation, comparability, and completeness are achieved. <br /> Optimize the Design: The RAW has been designed to provide the type and quantity of data needed to <br /> satisfy each of the aforementioned objectives. The RAW provides the specifications for the data <br /> collection activities, including the numbers of samples, respective locations and sampling techniques. The <br /> quality of the data will be assessed through the procedures described in this QAPP. <br /> 4.2 PRECISION,ACCURACY,REPRESENTATIVENESS,COMPARABILITY,AND <br /> COMPLETENESS <br /> The basis for assessing the elements of data quality is discussed in the following subsections. In the <br /> absence of laboratory-specific precision and accuracy limits, the QC limits described in this section must <br /> be met or exceeded. Evaluation of selected data will be conducted using the following elements, if, and to <br /> the extent required,by DTSC. <br /> 4.2.1 Precision <br /> Precision measures the reproducibility of repetitive measurements. It is strictly defined as the degree of <br /> mutual agreement among independent measurements as the result of repeated application of the sample <br /> process under similar conditions. <br /> Akk <br /> CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.