Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> . 03 March 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0111 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />' 3 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br />' TPH-g was detected in samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1;MW-4 and MW-5 at <br /> concentrations of 57 micrograms per later (,ug/1), 190 µg11 and 160 ug/l, respectively These <br /> concentrations are near the low end of the range of TPH-g concentrations previously detected in <br />' ground water samples collected from these wells The sample collected from monitoring well MW-2 <br /> did not contain a detectable concentration of TPH-g this 4uarter,but has periodically during previous <br /> monitoring events <br />' TPH-d was detected in samples from wells MW-1, MW-4 and MW-5 at concentrations of 83 µg11, <br /> 290,000µg/1 and 11,000µg/l,respectively The concentration from well MW-4 are at the high end <br /> Iof the range of TPH-d concentrations detected in ground water samples collected from this well <br /> during previous ground water monitoring events Laboratory notations for the ground water sample <br /> collected from wells MW-4 and MW-5 indicated the presence of an immiscible sheen <br />' Benzene was detected int <br /> samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-4 a concentrations <br /> t • of 37µg/l, 10µg/I and 4 9µg/l, respectively Ethylbenzene was detected in MW-1, MW-2 MW-4 <br /> and MW-5 at concentrations as high as 2 3 µg/1 Xylenes were detected in samples from MW-1 and <br /> MW-2 at concentrations as high as 2 9 µg11 <br />' MTBE was detected by EPA Method 8260 Modified in samples collected from wells MW-1,MW-4 <br /> and MW-5 at concentrations of 370 µg11, 45 µg/l and 29 µg/1, respectively <br />' Analytical results of ground water samples are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3 The laboratory <br /> report(MAI Laboratory Sample No 00755 to 00760), quality assurance and quality control report <br />' and chain-of-custody are included in Appendix B <br />'+ 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> A <br /> t Based upon data collected from the site during the current and preceding ground water monitoring <br /> events, AGE concludes <br />' During the December 1998 monitoring event,the inferred ground water flow direction at the <br /> site was generally toward the northeast, consistent with the inferred ground water flow <br /> direction determined from the previous ground water monitoring events The gradient was <br />' approximately 0 005 ft/ft or 28 feet per mile <br /> . In general,the concentrations of TPH-g and BTEX detected in the ground water samples are <br />' at the low end of the range of concentrations previously detected, indicating that the mass <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental Inc. <br />