Laserfiche WebLink
_ ENVIRON*-LvIENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ¢: Fg--v Donna K. Heran, R.E.H.S. Unit Supervisors <br /> < Director 304 East Weber Avenue,Third Floor Carl Borgman,R.E.H.S. <br /> Laurie A. Cotulla, R.E.H.S. Stockton,California 95202-2708 Mike Huggins, R.E.H.S., R.D.I. <br /> Program Manager Douglas W. Wilson, R.E.H.S. <br /> Telephone: (209)468-3420 g <br /> <<p b R � Margaret Lagorio,R.E.H.S. <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 Robert McClellon, R.E.H.S. <br /> Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd/ Jeff Carruesco, R.E.H.S. <br /> APR 2 4 2006 <br /> CARL KNOWLES <br /> P O Box 640 <br /> WOODBRIDGE CA 95258 <br /> RE: 1140 W HAMMER LANE SITE CODE: 1124 <br /> STOCKTON CA <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) is the lead agency providing the <br /> oversight of the investigation and cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks (UST) <br /> within San Joaquin County. EHD has a contract with California State Water Resources Control <br /> Board (SWRCB) to conduct a UST corrective action program. Your site was placed in the Local <br /> Oversight Program on 15 August 1989. <br /> Your site previously operated as a retail gasoline service station until 1986. In 1987, 6 USTs and <br /> the associated product piping and dispensers were removed under EHD permit and inspection. <br /> An unauthorized release was discovered at the time of the UST system removal. To mitigate the <br /> release, approximately 3000 cubic yards of contaminated soil was excavated and treated on-site. <br /> After treatment and soil confirmation sampling, the material was replaced and used to bring the <br /> excavation up to grade. <br /> Nine monitoring wells (MWs) have been installed to investigate the lateral extent of the soil and <br /> groundwater plumes. Historically, MW-5 has evidenced the highest groundwater contaminant <br /> concentrations. In addition to the 9 MWs,four soil borings in the area of MW-5 have been <br /> completed. Soil and groundwater grab samples were also collected from these borings. The <br /> vertical extent of impacted groundwater at your site has not been completed. Soil boring DB1a <br /> demonstrated the presence of poorly graded sand at 95 and 98 feet below ground surface (bgs). <br /> Due to the high concentrations of gasoline contaminants in the groundwater in the area of MW-5, <br /> site closure cannot be granted without further vertical investigation and necessary groundwater <br /> cleanup. <br /> EHD reviewed Feasibility Study Report. prepared by Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. with staff from <br /> the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB). In that report, four remedial <br /> alternatives for groundwater cleanup were evaluated. The remedial alternative selected by <br /> Ground Zero Analysis was use of Oxygen Release Compound (ORC). It has not been <br /> demonstrated to EHD that ORC has been effective for groundwater cleanup in a reasonable <br /> amount of time. In an EHD letter dated November 7, 2001, EHD recommended that you consider <br /> remedial alternatives other than ORC. <br /> On December 21, 2005, EHD and CVRWQCB staff met with Mr. John Dunlap, on behalf of Mr. <br /> Carl Knowles, and with Ground Zero Analysis. The site history and soil and groundwater <br /> assessment results were reviewed, and the need for additional vertical groundwater assessment <br /> and groundwater corrective action was discussed. <br /> EHD has recently completed a review of Workplan for Vertical Groundwater Investigation and <br /> Bench Test for In-situ Oxidation prepared by Ground Zero Analysis, dated 1 March, 2006. EHD <br /> offers the following comments regarding that work plan for your site. <br />