My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002102
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1120
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545244
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 10:24:45 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 9:11:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002102
RECORD_ID
PR0545244
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024606
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER KNOWLES STATION
STREET_NUMBER
1120
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07749027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1120 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JrX�"MWAAV—= <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> Based on the currently estimated areal extent of contamination, and assuming that an extraction <br /> well would optimally be located near MW5 (the well impacted to the greatest extent), a <br /> ' downgradient capture zone radius of approximately 100 feet would be necessary to capture the <br /> plume. The pumping rate required to achieve this can be calculated using the above equation <br /> ' and other pertinent data. The estimated pumping rate is approximately 21,300 gpd or 15 gpm. . <br /> ' Using an average water column depth of 15' as the maximum acceptable drawdown and applying <br /> the observed value of specific capacity of approximately 2 8 gpm/ft, the theoretical sustainable <br /> ' pumping rate for the extraction well would be approximately 42 gpm However, the existing <br /> site wells are all 2 inches in diameter and the maximum capacity for a pump less than 2 inches <br /> in diameter is 3 gpm. This rate would not be sufficient to effect hydraulic control over the <br /> plume of groundwater contamination A dedicated extraction well with a diameter of 4 to 6 <br /> ' inches would be required <br />. The results and conclusions presented herein are based on data obtained from the pumping well <br /> only, as no response was seen in observation wells An interpretation of pump test data from <br /> observation wells more accurately estimates aquifer parameters such as transmissivity. <br /> Therefore, actual aquifer characteristics and well responses may differ from those estimated <br /> here. <br /> ' The ability of groundwater extraction and treatment to cost effectively achieve remediation is <br /> dependent on several factors in addition to aquifer transmnssnvlty and yield. Chef among these <br /> are the type and cost of treatment, the type of discharge permit obtainable, groundwater cleanup <br /> ' standards and potential re-introduction of contaminants from both vadose and phreatic soil <br /> ' 6.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION <br /> I Site Geology <br /> ' Subsurface soils beneath the site consists predominately of clays from surface grade to <br /> approximately 12 to 20 feet below grade, clayey sand to well graded sand from approximately <br /> 150008UUT0RT3\CAP-0794 DRF 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.