Laserfiche WebLink
standardized well sampling log sheet. Table 1 summar <br /> groundwater sampling data for May 10, 1989. izes the <br /> Table 1 Monitor Well Purge Data <br /> Total Depth to 3 Purge <br /> Well Doh Water Flow purge <br /> Voluames Rate o <br /> V- <br /> MWI 23 . 29 12 .40 21 . 3al <br /> MW2 24 . 07 g 12 . 0 GPM <15 gal <br /> MW3 12 . 68 22 .3 gal 12. 0 GPM <br /> 23 . 04 13 . 29 19 . 1 gal 12 . 0 GPM <15 gal <br /> <15 gal <br /> All three wells pumped dry at 12-13 <br /> dry, allowed to recover and then �'m' The wells were pumped <br /> being repeated 3-4 times at each well. The y again, <br /> m a was sets approxi- <br /> mately <br /> mately 2 feet above the bottom of the well urn the pe. In <br /> the last moments of well purging, the g purge' In <br /> conductivity of the water was measured and recorded temperature, and <br /> nation for May 10, 1989 is summarized in Table 2 . The infor- <br /> Table 2 Field Water Quality Measurements <br /> WellTemperature Conductivity <br /> PH de rees C (in icromhos <br /> MW1 8. 2 19. 9 <br /> MW2 7. 8 21. 0 410 <br /> MW3 8. 1 20. 5 929 <br /> 575 <br /> A record of purging activities, including the volume of water <br /> purged, the pump discharge rate, and the purging time was main- <br /> tained on the sample log sheets. Water Sampling Logs, presented <br /> at the end of this report, contain the well specific data as <br /> recorded in the field. <br /> Prior to any purging each well was inspected for floating <br /> prod- <br /> uct. The water was then sampled for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> by use of a Teflon bailer . The bailer was lowered into the well <br /> and it 's contents were poured directly into two <br /> dried 1 liter amber glass bottles. cleaned, kiln <br /> The wells were then <br /> and the pump was pulled from the well. With the Purged, <br /> well , groundwater samples were collected again PbyP out of the <br /> teflon bailer into the well . The bailer was loweredl into weripeach <br /> well using new, clean monofillament line. <br /> s lne <br /> reused between samplings. was not <br /> Water collected in � thei bailer was <br /> poured directly from the bailer into two cleaned, kiln dried, 40 <br /> Milliliter (ml) , amber glass vials and capped with a teflon lined <br /> septa screw caps. The bailer was decontaminated between each <br /> sampling using the same techniques as described for the split- <br /> spoon analytical sampling. The pump was thoroughly cleaned prior <br />