|
Nestle USA, Inc.—Ripon, CA January 28, 2011
<br /> 2011 Revised Feasibility Study
<br /> xxx" California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Div. 4, Article 5.5, §64444.5, Table 2.2
<br /> xxx"' California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Div. 4, Article 5.5, §64444.
<br /> xxxiv 33 USC §§ 1251-1376
<br /> xxxV 40 CFR Part 131
<br /> xxxvi SWRCB 1991. California Inland Surface Waters Plan. Water Quality Control Plan for Inland
<br /> Surface Waters of California. 91-12WQ. State Water Resources Control Board. April 1991.
<br /> xxxvii http://www.arb.ca.gov/bact/docs/stationary.htm
<br /> xxxviii Federal Emergency Management Agency, FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map, City of Ripon,
<br /> California, San Joaquin County, Panel 0780B, Map Number 0604570780B, Revised
<br /> December 16, 2005.
<br /> xxx'x National Research Council. Alternatives for Groundwater Cleanup, 315 pp., National
<br /> Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1994.
<br /> A Environmental Cost Management, Inc., 2007 Long-Term Treated Water Disposal
<br /> Alternative Evaluation Report Former Nestle USA, Inc. Facility, Ripon, California. June
<br /> 2007
<br /> A ITRC. 2005. Permeable Reactive Barriers: Lessons Learned/New Directions. Report #
<br /> PRB-4. Washington, DC: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Permeable Reactive
<br /> Barriers Team.
<br /> x'" Li, T., and Farrell, J. 2001. Electrochemical Investigation of The Rate-Limiting Mechanisms
<br /> For Trichloroethylene and Carbon Tetrachloride Reduction at Iron Surfaces. Environmental
<br /> Science and Technology 35(17), 3560-3565.
<br /> xm Roberts, A.L., L.A. Totten, W.A. Arnold, D.R. Burris, and T.J. Campbell. 1996. Reductive
<br /> Elimination of Chlorinated Ethylenes By Zero-Valent Metals. Environmental Science and
<br /> Technology 30, No. 8.
<br /> AV Gillham RW and Hannesin SF. 1994. Enhanced Degradation Of Halogenated Aliphatics By
<br /> Zerovalent Iron. Ground Water 32, 958-967.
<br /> AV Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment, Technical Directorate
<br /> Environmental Science Division, Technology Transfer Outreach Office, 2008 Technical
<br /> Protocol for Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation Using Permeable Mulch Biowalls and
<br /> Bioreactors, 2008.
<br /> Av' Johnson, P.C.. 1998. An Assessment of the Contributions of Volatilization and Bio-
<br /> degradation to In Situ Air Sparging Performance. Environmental Science and Technology.
<br /> 32 (2). 276-281.
<br /> x1v" Alvarez, P.J.J. and W. Illman, 2006. Bioremediation and Natural Attenuation of
<br /> Groundwater Contaminants: Process Fundamentals and Mathematical Models. John Wiley
<br /> &Sons. ISBN No. 0-471-65043-9.
<br /> x1v"' Ahlfeld, D.P., A. Dahmani, and W. Ji. 1994. A Conceptual Model of Field Behavior of Air
<br /> Sparging and its Implications For Application. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation.
<br /> Fall, 14(4):132-139.
<br /> Ax Hein, G.L., J.S. Gierke, N.J. Hutzler, and R.W. Falta. 1997. Three-Dimensional
<br /> Experimental Testing of a Two-Phase Flow-Modeling Approach For Air Sparging. Ground
<br /> Water Monitoring & Remediation. Summer, 17(3):222-230.
<br /> Brooks, M.C., W.R. Wise, and M.D. Annable. 1999. Fundamental Changes In In-situ Air
<br /> Sparging Flow Patterns. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation. Spring, 19(2):105-113.
<br /> 50
<br />
|