My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JAHANT
>
6787
>
3000 – Underground Injection Control Program
>
PR0518315
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 5:24:38 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 4:20:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3000 – Underground Injection Control Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518315
PE
3030
FACILITY_ID
FA0013829
FACILITY_NAME
KOOYMAN DAIRY/ LAB CLEAN UP
STREET_NUMBER
6787
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
JAHANT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6787 E JAHANT RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mika Infurna <br /> From: Janes.Elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:20 AM <br /> To: Margaret Lagorio <br /> Cc: Mike Infurna <br /> Subject: Re: UIC sites <br /> Hi Margaret and Mike: sorry for not getting back to you sooner. <br /> 1. General approach: Each site is unique, depending on soils, depth to <br /> ground water and the types/concentrations of pollutants disposed. <br /> Faster percolating soils may not show any contamination unless it is <br /> recent, so a lot of sampling wouldn't show anything. Use your best <br /> professional judgement, and never fully release environmental liability, <br /> because even the most thorough investigation could miss something. <br /> 2. Do you need to cc: EPA on correspondence? It would help if you <br /> would cc: us on closure letters, so they can be logged into the <br /> statewide inventory. You don't need to call me on every one. <br /> 3. Re: dairy/toluene site: I would ask for a sample from biomat/sludge <br /> accumulated in leachlines, in an area before the break. I would also <br /> want to know how the tank refilled - ground water infiltration, rain <br /> water? Which could indicate potential to leak out. If the concentration <br /> was less in refill, how dirty is the sludge? If sludge is clean, and <br /> you are satisfied with the sampling of rinsate to insure no residual <br /> soluble pollutant remains, backfilling tank with a clean solid material <br /> could be acceptable; backfilling with clean local soil and regrading <br /> would improve property value. <br /> 4. Re: Caltrans workplan - it looks acceptable. Again, I would request <br /> a sludge sample from inside one or more of the leachlines, using TCLP to <br /> screen and then more later, depending on what showed up. The only other <br /> question I would ask is why they are going 44 feet at sampling site B1. <br /> Noticeably absent from workplan was information about the lifetime of <br /> the leachfield and ground water flow direction. <br /> I hope this is helpful. I am going to leave Martha Adams a message that <br /> final approval should come from your agency, not EPA. <br /> Margaret Lagorio <br /> <mlagorio@sjcehd. To: Elizabeth Janes/R9/USEPA/US@EPA <br /> comms CC: Mike Infurna <br /> <minfurna@sjcehd.com> <br /> Subject: UIC sites <br /> 05/15/2002 04 :16 <br /> PM <br /> Liz, <br /> I previously described a site to you that was at a dairy and someone <br /> used a <br /> trailer for drug manufacturing and the septic tank had Coleman fuel <br /> disposed <br /> into it. Mike and I have looked at guidelines for UIC program andFILE. COPY <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.