My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JACK TONE
>
4505
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523363
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 8:24:31 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 4:31:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0523363
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0015787
FACILITY_NAME
SIERRA HILLS PACKING
STREET_NUMBER
4505
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
JACK TONE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
08917052
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4505 4799 N JACK TONE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Figure 2 shows a contour map of groundwater elevation data collected on January 24,2005. The <br /> indicated direction of groundwater flow shown in Figure 2 is almost due west which is <br /> approximately parallel to the slope of regional topography in the area. The hydraulic gradient <br /> depicted in Figure 2 was calculated to be 0.0197 fl/ft. A gradient of that magnitude is consistent <br /> with a fine grained,low hydraulic conductivity formation(low yield wells). It is interesting to note <br /> that a contour map of elevation data collected on January 6th and not including results from MW-3, <br /> indicates a flow direction toward the northwest at approximately the same gradient. <br /> 4.2 Results of Well Sampling <br /> Table 3 shows a summary of laboratory analytical results for groundwater samples initially <br /> collected from the four monitoring wells. Copies of the laboratory analytical report sheets are <br /> included as Appendix C. Each sample was analyzed for a total of 35 constituents which include 6 <br /> organic compounds, 12 inorganic compounds, 7 nitrogen compounds, and 10 general water quality <br /> parameters. <br /> • Table 3 also lists available regulatory concentrations for each tested parameter.The regulatory <br /> concentration data are provided for reference only and may not be applicable or enforceable at the <br /> site. Regulatory limits were found for only 15 of the 35 constituents listed in Table 3. All values <br /> which exceed regulatory levels have been highlighted. <br /> There are three items worth noting from the data in Table 3. First,the concentration of chloroform <br /> in MW-4 is reported at 7.0 micrograms per liter(gg/L) and the regulatory concentration for <br /> chloroform is 6.2 gg/L. The concentration of chloroform should be watched carefully in subsequent <br /> sampling data because it is a known constituent in the wastewater pond. Second,the analytical <br /> detection limit for bromodichloromethane and dibromochloromethane is reported at 0.5 µg/L and <br /> the regulatory concentrations for these compounds are reported to be 0.18 µg/L and 0.12µg/L, <br /> respectively. The method detection limit identified in the approve Workplan is consistent with the <br /> reported detection limits. Finally,well MW-3 is indicated to have anomalously high concentrations <br /> of pH,total dissolved solids(also reflected in specific conductance), and bicarbonate alkalinity. It <br /> seems unlikely that those values are representative of the aquifer. When considered together with <br /> • <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.