My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JACK TONE
>
4505
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523363
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 8:24:31 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 4:31:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0523363
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0015787
FACILITY_NAME
SIERRA HILLS PACKING
STREET_NUMBER
4505
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
JACK TONE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
08917052
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4505 4799 N JACK TONE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the documented well construction problems at MW-3,a significant concern over well integrity <br /> becomes warranted. <br /> 5.0 Discussion,Summary,and Conclusions <br /> It should be noted that the results of a single round of sampling results do not necessarily constitute <br /> a reliable indication of groundwater conditions. It is well documented that constituent <br /> concentrations in groundwater fluctuate with seasonal changes and that there are inherent <br /> uncertainties introduced during sample collection and laboratory analysis. In fact,USEPA standard <br /> methodology requires that a minimum of 16 independent groundwater samples be collected(usually <br /> as quarterly samples from 4 wells during a period of one year) and statistical analysis be conducted <br /> before any legally defensible conclusions regarding groundwater quality can be established. <br /> The direction of groundwater flow is indicated to be toward the west, and MW-3 is located <br /> immediately south of the wastewater pond. It could be suggested that MW-3 does not represent <br /> down-gradient groundwater conditions from the wastewater pond. However, it is contended that <br /> any seepage from the waste water pond,while traveling 100 feet down to the groundwater table, <br /> would necessarily be dispersed such that well MW-3 can be considered to be directly beneath the <br /> wastewater pond from a hydrogeologic perspective. Additionally,published maps of groundwater <br /> elevation from the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District indicate that <br /> the site is situated near a groundwater divide and that groundwater flow has been toward the south <br /> at different times during recent years. This situation indicates that the direction of groundwater flow <br /> in the area is variable and that MW-3 and MW-4 may be directly down-gradient of the wastewater <br /> pond at certain times during the season. The variable direction of groundwater flow in the area <br /> may, in part,be the result of production well withdrawal. <br /> Well construction at MW-3 encountered problems which ultimately raise questions concerning well <br /> integrity. Samples from the well display unusually high pH and specific conductance, and the silt <br /> accumulates in the well at an excessive rate. Replacement of MW-3 with a new well should be <br /> considered. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.