Laserfiche WebLink
KLEINFELDER <br /> 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Kleinfelder was requested by San Joaquin County to assess two underground storage tank <br /> sites at the San Joaquin General Hospital One of the tanks (T1) was in use at the time of <br /> the request, but had failed a recent tank test, while the other tank (T2) had not been used <br /> in many years, and was scheduled for closure to allow for construction Because the tanks <br /> had been installed in the 1940's and accurate drawings of the tank locations were not <br /> ' available, and the prevalence of utility lines in the general vicinity of the tanks, a <br /> geophysical survey was conducted on September 19, 1991, to assess the locations of the <br /> tanks and the utility lines During the performance of the geophysical survey, a third tank <br /> (T3)was found adjacent to tank 72 <br />' On October 31, 1991, two soil borings were dulled at opposite ends of tank Tl. Qualitative <br /> organic vapor readings indicated the possibility of shallow contamination on the east side <br /> of T1 or its associated service lines Three samples were analyzed from the east side of T1, <br /> and two additional samples were analyzed from the west side, to quantitatively assess the <br /> i <br /> potential contaminant concentrations Per San Joaquin County's Public Health <br /> Department, Environmental Health Division's direction, the samples were analyzed for <br /> extractable TPH, purgeable TPH, BTEX, EDB, and total lead Of the above analytes, only <br /> lead was detected above the laboratory reporting limit for the samples submitted from the <br /> ' borings drilled adjacent to tank T1 Based on the analytical data for the samples submitted <br /> from the tank Tl borings, Kleinfelder recommends no further assessment of the soil in the <br /> vicinity of tank T1 <br /> Also on October 31, 1991, one angle soil boring was drilled beneath tank T2 and one angle <br /> boring was drilled beneath tank T3 Due to the limited access, the borings were drilled <br /> from the east side of the tanks and angled such that they passed approximately 3 feet <br /> ' beneath the east end of the tanks and approximately 15 feet beneath the west (fill) end of <br /> the tanks Two samples were analyzed from each of the borings The samples were <br /> ' analyzed for the same petroleum hydrocarbon constituents as the tank T1 samples Sample <br /> 61099, collected from beneath the west end of tank T2 in boring B-2, and sample 61096, <br /> collected from beneath the west end of tank T3 in boring B-1, contained reportable <br /> iconcentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons and lead The samples collected from beneath <br /> the east ends of the tanks were reported to contain lead above the laboratory reporting <br /> limit, but petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were below laboratory reporting limits <br /> FR21-91-29 Page 9 of 11 <br /> ' Copyright 1991 Kleinfelder,Inc <br />