My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BUCKLEY COVE
>
4911
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0513938
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2020 1:15:27 PM
Creation date
2/10/2020 11:47:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0513938
PE
2220
FACILITY_ID
FA0002683
FACILITY_NAME
LADDS MARINA
STREET_NUMBER
4911
STREET_NAME
BUCKLEY COVE
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
000-037-098-3
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4911 BUCKLEY COVE WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Patricia Bonnifield Page 3 October 20, 2003 <br />surface soil results were also compared to 2002 Residential and Industrial Preliminary <br />Remediation Goals (PRGs).2 PRGs are risk-based concentrations that are intended to <br />assist individuals in initial screening -level evaluations of environmental concentrations <br />of chemicals. Generally, if a site concentration of a chemical is below its PRG, the <br />chemical is not considered to pose a potential health threat. <br />The pre -excavation samples taken by SJCEHD showed that the used sandblast grit contains <br />levels of copper that would result in this material being classified as a Non-RCRA hazardous <br />waste. The results for the sandblast debris/soil mixture (sample SBD on Table 2) indicate that <br />the excavated soil does not need to be managed as neither a characteristic RCRA (federal) nor a <br />Non-RCRA (California) hazardous waste. Disposal of this material may be allowable in a Class <br />III landfill if the levels of metals are consistent with the individual landfill's waste acceptance <br />criteria. <br />Among the 17 metals for which the three confirmation soil samples were analyzed, arsenic, <br />cadmium, copper, molybdenum, and silver occurred at a concentration above the general soil <br />level (based on the California data set) in one or more samples. We believe that these metals are <br />not derived from sand blasting activities, because the concentration of these same metals in the <br />sandblast debris sample (SBD) are substantially lower then California data set. <br />Therefore, the site concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, copper, molybdenum, and silver are <br />naturally occurring. Entire Buckley Cove area including Ladd's Marina was created by man- <br />made fills in the 1940's from a variety of sources. Fill from river dredging and imported soil <br />from the greater Stockton area was used to create the landmass on both sides of Buckley Cove <br />Way. As such it would not be considered unique for some of the metals to exceed the levels <br />observed in the California data set. <br />The PRGs were used to assess the potential health significance of the chemical residuals in the <br />soil. Except for arsenic, the concentrations of all the metals were at least 5 -fold below both the <br />applicable residential and industrial PRGs. The concentration of arsenic in the site soil is greater <br />than both the residential and industrial PRGs. However, the natural levels of arsenic in <br />California soils also are above the PRGs. As noted above, the concentrations of arsenic at the <br />site are very close to the range that is typically seen in California soil. Thus, the risks associated <br />with the arsenic in the soil are consistent with ambient health risks. <br />The potential for impacted soil to reach a surface water was considered by evaluating the <br />topography of the site. The sandblast area is located approximately 100 feet away from the <br />closest surface water body. Although topographically higher than the surface water, the area <br />immediately adjacent to the sandblast area slopes inward toward the sandblast compound. <br />z U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. 2002. Preliminary Remediation Goals. Available on the <br />Internet at http://www.epa. og v/region09/waste/sfund/prg/index.htm <br />CAWINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\UTCIOUZE\Ladd's Investigation Report[1].doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.