My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
26500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544501
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2020 9:09:16 PM
Creation date
2/10/2020 3:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544501
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0014311
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT
STREET_NUMBER
26500
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
SEE COMMENTS
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
26500 S CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS Phone: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: Antonia K. J. Vorster FROM: Camilla Williams <br /> Senior WRC Engineer ( Engineering Geologist <br /> DATE: 31 January 1992 SIGNATURE: <br /> SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE WORK PLAN FOR REMEDIAL ACTION AT BUILDING 201, DEFENSE <br /> DISTRIBUTION REGION WEST (DDRW), TRACY, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the Work Plan entitled "Remedial Action at Building 201" for the DDRW, <br /> Tracy site. The Work Plan was submitted on 29 January 1992 by International Technology <br /> (IT) Corporation. A draft Work Plan entitled "Soil Treatment/Disposal , Building 201, " <br /> submitted most recently on 2 December 1991, was also reviewed. <br /> One of the major problems with the Work Plan is that the existing data from the 1991 <br /> soil sampling at the Building 201 tank excavation were not presented. The Work Plan <br /> did not summarize the results of all of the soil samples, did not present the data in <br /> tabular and graphical form and did not present the laboratory analytical sheets. <br /> Because the existing data were not presented in the Work Plan, it is not possible to <br /> evaluate the adequacy of the proposals or to make recommendations for the <br /> investigation. DDRW, Tracy should submit the existing soil data. The soils data <br /> should be summarized in tabular form and should specify the depth of the samples, the <br /> locations of the samples should be depicted on a map of the excavation and the <br /> laboratory analytical sheets should be provided. <br /> The second major problem was that the Work Plan did not propose any plans for the known <br /> soil contamination at the Building 201 tank excavation site. DDRW, Tracy must submit <br /> a plan to remediate the fuel contaminated soils. <br /> My detailed comments on the Work Plan are listed below. <br /> Page 1-2. The only data provided in the Work Plan from the existing data collected <br /> by DDRW, Tracy in 1991 are the maximum contaminant concentrations found in <br /> tie soil samples. The reported concentrations for gasoline (340 <br /> milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)) , diesel (3900 mg/kg) , benzene (9.3 <br /> mg/kg) , toluene (21 mg/kg) , ethyl benzene (2.2 mg/kg) and xylene (13 mg/kg) <br /> are very high. These concentrations indicate that the soils must be <br /> remediated so that they do not pose a threat to water quality. The <br /> submittal did not propose any plans to remediate the fuel contamination in <br /> the soils. A plan for remediation of the fuel contaminated soils needs to <br /> be submitted. <br /> Based on the concentrations and depending on the depth of the soil samples <br /> (which are unknown) , floating product could exist at this tank site. If <br /> the ground water is determined to be contaminated, then it will need <br /> remediation and DDRW, Tracy will need to submit plans for an extraction <br /> system and modification of the Interim Remedial Measure (IRM) . <br /> Page 1-3. The Work Plan states that the lead concentration found in contaminated <br /> soils is as high as 26,000 mg/kg. This concentration exceeds the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.