Laserfiche WebLink
S E C O R <br /> r2003 Feasibility Study Report and Site Assessment Work Plan <br /> July 18, 2003 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Two soil samples were collected from the former pump island area. Groundwater was <br /> observed in the tank excavation at approximately 8 feet bgs. (PEG, 1995). <br /> • In May 1995, Pacific Environmental Group submitted a Problem Assessment Report, dated <br /> May 15, 1995 (PEG, 1995). The principal findings of the PAR are listed below: <br /> 1. The lateral and vertical extent of dissolved hydrocarbons in the lower water bearing <br /> zones was adequately defined. <br /> 2. Continued operation of the containment system, including the pumping of <br /> groundwater from the extraction wells maintained the shallow groundwater plume on <br /> site. <br /> 3. Continued SPH recovery and extraction of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons from three <br /> wells within the SPH plume on site reduced hydrocarbon mass in groundwater. <br /> • On March 25, 1996, a dual extraction system (DE) system began continuous operation. The <br /> DE system was comprised of 14 DE wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-7, MW-8, MW-14, MW-15, <br /> MW-16, and DE-1 through DE-7), a water knockout tank, an oil/water separator, four <br /> granular activated carbon vessels arranged in series, and a thermal oxidizer. In May of <br /> 1997, site data suggested the onsite SPH plume had been substantially diminished by the <br /> DE system. In addition, groundwater influent concentrations of TPHd had declined from <br /> 69,000 micrograms per liter (,ug/L) to 5,300 and influent vapor concentrations had declined <br /> from 300 parts per million by volume (ppmv) to 21 ppmv (SECOR, 1997). The DE system <br /> was shut down in June of 1997. Temporary shutdown of the DE system was approved by <br /> Ms. Gail Wiggett of the RWQCB during a meeting on June 2, 1997. <br /> • From September of 2001 through April of 2002, SECOR conducted a six-month ISO-GEN TM <br /> pilot test/feasibility study for groundwater treatment. The pilot test included the installation of <br /> six four-inch test wells (TW-1 through TW-6) and nine two-inch ISO-GEN TM monitoring wells <br /> (MW-24A through MW-32A). The groundwater monitoring wells and ISO-GENTm remediation <br /> wells have screen intervals of approximately 15 to 30 feet bgs and 5 to 30 feet bgs, <br /> respectively. The ISO-GENTM treatment system appeared to have limited impact on the <br /> increase of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and the reduction of methyl tertiary butyl <br /> ether (MtBE) concentrations. However, the ISO-GENTM system did reduce TPHd <br /> concentrations in well MW-26A and MtBE concentrations in wells MW-28A and MW-32A <br /> (SECOR, 2003e). The results of the ISO-GENTM Pilot Study indicated the following <br /> biological activity is occurring at the Banta Fuel Terminal: <br /> 1 Nitrate (NO3) and sulfate (SO4) are present throughout the site, with the exception of <br /> the area around MW-26A. Nitrates and sulfate in this area are depleted due to <br /> natural biodegradation. <br /> 2. Surface water infiltration from the agricultural drainage trench is high in nitrates and <br /> sulfates. This situation creates a biodegradation-barrier to contaminant migration. <br /> 3. The mass flux of TPHd and MtBE along the down-gradient margin of the Banta Fuel <br /> Terminal is three orders in magnitude lower than the concentrations of available <br /> I:\Chevron\1001621\REPORTS\2003\2003FS\FS 2003 revD.doc <br />