Laserfiche WebLink
M - <br /> 4 �^ 4 <br /> 1 A. Namejsj of the Parties Cgtnsgl Represents, <br /> 2 Stephen J% Meyer, Steven H. Goldberg and Craig C. Allison of <br /> Downey, Bra04 Seymour & Rohwer are counsel. for FDIC;.. <br /> 4 5 �rfef .Summa*�y of the FActs and jdgoal 'Theories.. <br /> 5 This lawsuit arises out of environmental contamination which <br /> 5 has Peen discovered at the property located at 315 Hutchins <br /> 1% Avenue, Lodi, San i'oaquj County ("Situ):. FDIC is the receiver <br /> 8 fair Gity, andinthe real party in interest in this action. City <br /> 5 was the former owner of the Site. <br /> 10 The. contamination is alleged to: have resulted. from .learking <br /> 11 underground storage tanks systems (USTs) formerly located at the <br /> 12 site and owned and/or operated by the below named defendants <br /> 13 Further, it is alleged that the groundwater contamination at the <br /> 14 Site, in part, is attributable to off-site sources. <br /> 15 Defendant Richfield Company of California (predecessor in <br /> 16 interest to ARCOJ leased the Site and operated a gasoline service <br /> 1 station thereon., including the associated USTs, for an <br /> 18 indeterminateperiod of; gime including, but not. limited to, the <br /> 19 years 1925: through 1933.. <br /> 26 Defendant Union Oil Company leased the Site and operated `a. <br /> 21 gasoline services station thereon, including the: associated OOP., <br /> 22 for an indeterminate period of time including, riot not limited. <br /> ;23 to,, 1945 to 19570. s <br /> Defeni'dant Douglas oil company of California purchased the <br /> :25 Site and operated a gasoline service station thereon, including <br /> 26 the. associated USTs, for an indeterminate period of :gime, <br /> 27 including, not limited to, the years 1957 to 1971., <br /> 28 Texaco, Inc. {successor to Texaco Refining and Marketing, <br /> -2- <br />