Laserfiche WebLink
-46 <br /> r <br /> I Inc._) , purchased. the Site from Douglas in 1971, and operated a <br /> 2 gasoline service s9rtation at the> Site,, including the associated <br /> 3 USTss_, for an indeterrafnat+s period o time incluong., but not <br /> 4 limited to, the years 1971 to 1>979 <br /> :5 befendant Me Bokides Petroleum, Inc. praetntly owns, <br /> :6 possesasess,. and/brr controls, and since at least 19801 has owned, <br /> possessed:., and/or controlled commercial real property located. <br /> 8immediatelynorth of the site. Said <br /> property is currently being <br /> 9 operated as an "Exxon" gas/service station.,. and it is alleged <br /> 10 that the groundwater contamination at the Site, in part., is <br /> 11 attributed to activities on this property. <br /> 12 City acquired the Site on November 2, 1990 pursuant to a <br /> 13 Trustee*s Deed upon Sale. City filed :a complaint on July 10,. <br /> 1�€ 1992 in San Joaquin County Superior Court to recover th+e costs of <br /> 15 die hi. up thG7 contamination. <br /> 16 +tin July 9, 1993>, the. California Commissioner of <br /> 17 corporations deolared City insolvent and on,'the same day <br /> 18 appointed .FDIC as "Receiver. <br /> 19 FDIC removed this action to federal court on September 1, <br /> 20 1993. This court then imposed a mandatory :90-day stay._ The stay <br /> 21 originally was scheduled to end on January 13, _1994. <br /> 22 On January 31, 1994, this court conducted ai Status <br /> 23 Conference, After presentations by counsel for plaintiff and <br /> 24 defendants concerning the status of the litigation and matters <br /> 25 pertaining to the scope: and extent of the contamination at the <br /> 25 site, this court entered an order continuing the mandatory stay <br /> 27 pending :a further Status Conference. <br /> 28 The further Status Conference was origi.n.aliy scheduled for <br />