My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003067
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
1301
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545342
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003067
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2020 3:43:34 PM
Creation date
2/12/2020 8:57:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003067
RECORD_ID
PR0545342
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000392
FACILITY_NAME
FLAMES LIQUOR
STREET_NUMBER
1301
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
03104030
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1301 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> 28 February 2005 ` <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 99-0624 �� . <br /> Page 2 of 12 r,, sS r� <br /> ground water plume is somewhat defined to the south with CPT-1 and MW-5 "Accordingly, <br /> AGE will propose no additional wells south of Kettleman Lane at the present time <br /> • Comment 7-At this time,AGE does not agree with EHD's recommendation that soil vapor <br /> extraction be used as a method to remediate soil at the subject site Petroleum hydrocarbon- <br /> and MTBE-impacted soil does not appear to be significant in the areas assessed, AGE <br /> estimated the volume of MTBE in soil to be approximately 10 gallons — 4. o1 p KJ <br /> Nth <br /> The site setting is Illustrated on Figure I Site structures, soil borings and monitoring well locations <br /> are depicted on Figure 2 Site history and background information was presented in the AGE <br /> prepared Site Assessment Work Plan dated I 1 November 2004 1 Pl�j if t �� <br /> �{ln,c i+sCp€swjd+�in <br /> 2.0. FEASIBILITY OF INTERIM REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> Based on the site-specific problems associated with ground water and soil vapor extraction <br /> techniques discussed above,the remaining viable remedial alternatives that can be used as an interim <br /> remediation would be ozone sparging and batch removal of ground water <br /> 21 IN-SITU OZONE SPARGING <br /> The ozone sparge system is an in-situ air stripping and oxidation process utilizing fine bubbles of d V <br /> ozone injected Into saturated soil to extract and decompose dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> constituents An ozone generator is utilized to produce gaseous ozone which is injected into the <br /> subsurface via microsparge points or fine well screen The "microbubbles" (approximately 50 <br /> micrometers) are forced out Into the surrounding saturated soil and react with the target analytes, <br /> producing carbon dioxide and water The frequency and duration of ozone injection periods can be <br /> regulated at the ozone generator control box Initially, operation of the ozone�injection system will <br /> be based on the manufacturer's recommendations Injection rates, frequency and duration may be <br /> adjusted to compensate for site conditions during a pilot test, based on dissolved concentration <br /> reaction to the sparging,ground water flow direction changes and to reduce mounding of the ground <br /> water where necessary <br /> Costs for installation of an ozone system at the subject site range from$30,000 to$40,000,including <br /> the installation of sparging wells and underground piping Based on an operational period of 12 to <br /> 24 months, costs for the entire project would likely be between $65,000 and $100,000, depending <br /> upon regulatory requirements <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.