Laserfiche WebLink
from 26 vapor locations (SV-21 was saturated and no vapor or soil matrix samples were <br /> collected), and four groundwater grab samples. See Figure 3 for boring locations. The initial <br /> proposed scope included only 20 soil vapor locations with no soil matrix samples collected <br /> from the soil vapor locations. Six soil vapor locations were added to better evaluate the <br /> railroad spur along the western border of the property (SV-11 to SV-14) and to evaluate <br /> concrete patches discovered inside the building (SV-24 and SV-25). Soil matrix samples were <br /> collected from the soil vapor locations because the vapor samples were deemed to be of"poor <br /> quality" due to the high vacuum created by the dense clayey silt that underlies the Site to a <br /> depth of at least 50 feet bgs. In addition, shallow soil sampling from soil vapor probe borings <br /> along the railroad right-of-way (SV-10 to SV-14) sufficed for the shallow soil sampling <br /> included in the proposed scope of work. <br /> All down-hole drilling equipment was decontaminated using a three-stage process of a non- <br /> phosphate grade detergent (Alconox) mixed with potable water, a potable water rinse and a de- <br /> ionized water rinse. After collection of samples, each borehole was backfilled to near-surface <br /> with Portland cement grout, then sealed with a plug to match the existing ground cover. <br /> D. SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING <br /> Soil vapor sampling was conducted to assist in the location of areas of potential environmental <br /> concern. Twenty-six locations were located for soil vapor and soil matrix sample collection. <br /> Soil vapor sampling was conducted in accordance with the protocols developed by the <br /> California Department of Toxic Substances Control(DTSC) and the California Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (Advisory-Active Soil Gas Investigations, January <br /> 28, 2003). Soil vapor sampling probes were installed initially at 5 feet bgs but adjusted to 2 <br /> feet bgs or less because the native clayey silt created a vacuum such that no soil vapor (at 5 ft) <br /> could be collected. Almost all soil vapor samples were collected from what could be termed <br /> "sub-slab". Twenty-six soil vapor samples were collected for analysis. Polyethylene tubing was <br /> used for the probes. Probe tips were embedded within a minimum one-foot section of sand <br /> pack and sealed from surface ambient air by hydrated granular bentonite. At the surface, the <br /> tubing was marked with the probe depth and capped. <br /> After completion of soil vapor probe installation, 30 minutes of elapsed time was allowed for <br /> the soil vapor to reach equilibrium prior to sampling. A purge volume test was conducted in <br /> the SV-1 adjacent to the septic system. (See Figure 3 for location.) Isopropanol tracer gas was <br /> used as a leak check compound during soil vapor sample extraction and was analyzed and <br /> reported. Purge and sample rates were maintained between 100 to 200 milliliters per minute. <br /> Samples were collected in stainless steel and glass syringes. Sample containers were <br /> decontaminated per DTSC protocol prior to use. <br /> Soil vapor samples were analyzed in a certified on-site mobile laboratory (Environmental <br /> Support Technologies [EST], ELAP #2772) for VOC target analytes via modified USEPA <br /> Method 8260 analysis. <br /> Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report Pinnacle Environmental,Inc. <br /> 248 Industrial Avenue,Stockton,CA 95206 Page 12 <br />