My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FYFFE
>
305
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523599
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2020 5:23:18 PM
Creation date
2/12/2020 3:01:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0523599
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0015929
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON BLDG #16
STREET_NUMBER
305
STREET_NAME
FYFFE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95201
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
305 FYFFE AVE BLDG 16
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Jeffrey Wingfield field - 2 - 40 18 April 2007 <br /> p <br /> Port of Stockton <br /> be developed that depicts a single water bearing zone over the entire interval from 2 to 35 <br /> feet bgs. The soil boring logs and cross sections presented in the Report suggest that the <br /> sand materials within each of these zones are interconnected across zones. The fact that <br /> methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) concentrations in groundwater within zones are similar <br /> also suggests interconnection. <br /> 2. The down-gradient direction of groundwater, based on water table elevation data collected <br /> from four monitoring wells screened to a maximum depth of 10 feet, has been towards the <br /> northwest. However, the down-gradient direction of groundwater, based on MTBE <br /> groundwater concentration data collected from cone penetrometer test borings pushed into <br /> the upper 35 feet of the subsurface, appears to have been towards the west. Down-gradient <br /> wells have not been installed to the west of the former Building 16 UST site. <br /> 3. Groundwater samples have been collected after purging wells utilizing low-flow methods. <br /> However, the Port (or the Navy) has not established whether low-flow purging at this site <br /> yields samples that are representative of groundwater quality. For example, the maximum <br /> concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in the gasoline range in groundwater <br /> samples collected from the monitoring wells in August of 1999 was 13,000 micrograms per <br /> liter (I.Lg/L), whereas the maximum concentration in samples collected between November <br /> 1999 and January 2007 was 1 ,300 µg/L. The August 1999 samples were collected after the <br /> wells had been purged of at least three well volumes, the November 1999 and later samples, <br /> utilizing low-flow methods in which much less water was purged from each well. <br /> 4. Laboratory chemical analyses reports from three laboratory companies are included in <br /> Appendix C of the Report: Analytical Sciences, Mobil Chem Labs Inc., and Severn Trent <br /> Laboratories, Inc. The reporting of TPH in the gasoline range concentrations has varied in <br /> the reports prepared by these labs. Analytical Sciences includes the concentration of MTBE <br /> in the concentration of TPH in the gasoline range; Mobil Chem Labs Inc. does not. Also, it <br /> appears that Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc. included MTBE up until January 2007 at which <br /> time they did not. Laboratory chemical analyses concentration data for TPH in the gasoline <br /> range presented in report tables should be footnoted to indicate whether or not each <br /> concentration value includes the concentration of MTBE. <br /> For State of California UST proiects, chemical analysis laboratories commonly exclude <br /> MTBE from the concentrations reported for TPH in the gasoline range. For future sampling <br /> events, the Port should instruct their contract laboratories to exclude MTBE from the TPH in <br /> the gasoline range concentrations they report. MTBE should be reported separately. <br /> 5. Beginning in the first quarter of 2006, the Port resumed quarterly groundwater monitoring <br /> and sampling of Building 16 site monitoring wells. <br /> Work Plan Approval <br /> The Port plans to develop a new entry road for access to Rough and Ready Island. Their plan <br /> requires the removal of the four monitoring wells at the Building 16 site. Regional Water Board <br /> staff concurs with the Port's proposal to destroy monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4 and install <br /> replacement wells, provided the following comments are implemented: <br /> 1. The wells must be placed in the approximate locations proposed in the Work Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.